On 11/12/2019 11:19, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 12/11/2019 11:14 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 12:08:25PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 11/12/2019 12:04, Luca Boccassi:
>>>> On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 10:26 +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>>>>> The soname for each stable ABI version should be just the ABI version
>>>>> major
>>>>> number without the minor number. Unfortunately both major and minor
>>>>> were
>>>>> used causing version 20.1 to be incompatible with 20.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch fixes the issue by switching from 2-part to 3-part ABI
>>>>> version
>>>>> numbers so that we can keep 20.0 as soname and using the final digits
>>>>> to
>>>>> identify the 20.x releases which are ABI compatible. This requires
>>>>> changes
>>>>> to both make and meson builds to handle the three-digit version and
>>>>> shrink
>>>>> it to 2-digit for soname.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: cba806e07d6f ("build: change ABI versioning to global")
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <
>>>>> tho...@monjalon.net
>>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <
>>>>> bruce.richard...@intel.com
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch contains an alternative fix to that implied by the
>>>>> previous patches:
>>>>> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/63726/
>>>>>
>>>>> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/63728/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> ABI_VERSION | 2 +-
>>>>> drivers/meson.build | 4 ++--
>>>>> lib/meson.build | 4 ++--
>>>>> mk/rte.lib.mk | 5 ++++-
>>>>> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you! I've set a reminder in my calendar for September to revert
>>>> it :-)
>>>
>>> I don't think we need to revert it.
>>> The ABI version will have only 2 numbers (21.0).
>>> In makefile there is no change.
>>> What needs to be changed in meson?
>>>
>> We need to remove the explicit use of so_version, and let meson just do the
>> right thing with the lib version. That being said, I can see about having
>> meson behave as make so that it will work even if we forget (i.e. even with
>> changed behaviour we should still remove the explicit soversion usage when
>> it's no longer needed).
>>
>
> Current major become two digits, "20.0", I think we fix it to single digit,
> "21", again in 20.11.
>
> I suggest adding this to deprecation notice document, with 20.11 target, so it
> can stay there and remind us the change.
>
+1, we do.
So name, should be comprised of the library name and the major version only.
Ray K
