Hi Kevin,
>From: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 10:52 AM
>
>On 14/01/2020 04:51, Jerin Jacob wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 7:12 AM Rasesh Mody <rm...@marvell.com>
>wrote:
>>>
>>> Skip the device re-initialization for secondary process.
>>>
>>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.com
>>
>> Correct Cc: to sta...@dpdk.org
>>
>
>Is it a fix, or secondary process was not intended to be supported previously?
>If it is a fix, please provide the Fixed commit (will save Ferruh searching
>for it).
Secondary process was not intended to be supported previously. So it is ok to
not backport the change to all ongoing stable releases.
However, the change has been tested with DPDK 19.11, I am wondering if it can
be pulled in that stable tree.
Please see below the fixline tag.
Fixes: 540a211084a7 ("bnx2x: driver core")
Thanks!
-Rasesh
>
>> Applied to dpdk-next-net-mrvl/master. Thanks
>>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rasesh Mody <rm...@marvell.com>
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_ethdev.c | 5 +++++
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_ethdev.c
>>> b/drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_ethdev.c
>>> index 20b045ff87..7864b5b80a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_ethdev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_ethdev.c
>>> @@ -598,6 +598,11 @@ bnx2x_common_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev
>>> *eth_dev, int is_vf)
>>>
>>> eth_dev->dev_ops = is_vf ? &bnx2xvf_eth_dev_ops :
>>> &bnx2x_eth_dev_ops;
>>>
>>> + if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
>>> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, sc, "Skipping device init from secondary
>process");
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> rte_eth_copy_pci_info(eth_dev, pci_dev);
>>>
>>> sc->pcie_bus = pci_dev->addr.bus;
>>> --
>>> 2.18.0
>>>
>>
