Hi, jia

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guo, Jia <jia....@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 10:27 PM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei <beilei.x...@intel.com>; Ye, Xiaolong
> <xiaolong...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix flow FDIR enable issue
> 
> hi, zhaowei
> 
> On 5/21/2020 4:03 PM, Wei Zhao wrote:
> > When we flush flow FDIR, all queues are disabled for FDIR.
> > If FDIR rule is created again, then the flow list is empty, as it is
> > the first time to create rule after flush fdir filter, so we need to
> > enable FDIR for all queues. And also, disable FDIR for queues should
> > be done in function i40e_flow_flush_fdir_filter().
> >
> > Fixes: 1491f63c7559 ("net/i40e: fix flush of flow director filter")
> > Fixes: 6ae9b2b5e8c2 ("net/i40e: cache flow director enable value in Rx
> > queue")
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zh...@intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > v2:
> > update log info
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c | 10 +++++++---
> >   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c index 25c77e7aa..8f8df6fae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> > @@ -3462,6 +3462,10 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_filter(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> >             }
> >     }
> >
> > +   /* If create the first fdir rule, enable fdir check for rx queues */
> > +   if (TAILQ_EMPTY(&pf->fdir.fdir_list))
> > +           i40e_fdir_rx_proc_enable(dev, 1);
> > +
> 
> 
> Do you think it is make sense that move the configure out of the priors
> condition? If so the list empty check is no need here.
> 
>      if (pf->fdir.fdir_vsi == NULL) {
> .....
>      }
> 
>      ret = i40e_fdir_configure(dev);
> 

That seems more reasonable, but I do not know what will happen for this , 
because
That will cause i40e_fdir_configure() be called every time when download rule. 
I dare not make this change for fear of introducing more problems.

> 
> >     return 0;
> >   err:
> >     i40e_fdir_teardown(pf);
> > @@ -5330,9 +5334,6 @@ i40e_flow_flush(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct
> rte_flow_error *error)
> >             return -rte_errno;
> >     }
> >
> > -   /* Disable FDIR processing as all FDIR rules are now flushed */
> > -   i40e_fdir_rx_proc_enable(dev, 0);
> > -
> >     return ret;
> >   }
> >
> > @@ -5368,6 +5369,9 @@ i40e_flow_flush_fdir_filter(struct i40e_pf *pf)
> >             for (pctype = I40E_FILTER_PCTYPE_NONF_IPV4_UDP;
> >                  pctype <= I40E_FILTER_PCTYPE_L2_PAYLOAD; pctype++)
> >                     pf->fdir.inset_flag[pctype] = 0;
> > +
> > +           /* Disable FDIR processing as all FDIR rules are now flushed */
> > +           i40e_fdir_rx_proc_enable(dev, 0);
> >     }
> >
> >     return ret;

Reply via email to