> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Hrvoje Habjanic
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 6:25 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] rte_sched: correctly free allocated subport
> memory
> 
> In function rte_sched_subport_free (lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c, line 865),
> there is code to free all allocated stuff related to scheduler subport. First
> there are some checks, and in the end, rte_bitmap_free is called.
> 
> Now, rte_bitmap_free is a dummy function, and it just checks if provided
> pointer to bitmap is valid or not. So, actual memory for subport is not freed.
> 
> This patch fixes this by removing call to rte_bitmap_free, and instead calling
> rte_free.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hrvoje Habjanic <hrvoje.habja...@zg.ht.hr>
> ---
>  lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c b/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c index
> c0983ddda..f15a3b515 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c
> @@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ rte_sched_subport_free(struct rte_sched_port *port,
>               }
>       }
> 
> -     rte_bitmap_free(subport->bmp);
> +     rte_free(subport);
>  }
> 
>  void
> --
> 2.17.1
Hi Hrvoje;

I guess this is your first patch to dpdk.org, here are some suggestions when 
you send bug fixes;

- When sending fixes, please use "fix" word in the subject line, e.g- 
rte_sched: fix subport memory leak
- The commit message should include commit id corresponding to the line that 
you fixes as shown below for this case. 
   Fixes: d9213b829a31 ("sched: remove pipe params config from port level")

Patch looks good to me.

Acked-by: Jasvinder Singh <jasvinder.si...@intel.com>


Reply via email to