On 6/2/20 12:14 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 01/06/2020 21:59, Dmitry Kozlyuk: >> 1. What do you think about changing rte_ to rte_eal_ prefix for memory >> management wrappers in MM series as Andrew Rybchenko suggested for v1? Since >> the functions are DPDK-internal, this sounds reasonable to me. > > For lib-internal function, the prefix should not start with rte_. > For exported function (even if internal), the prefix should be > rte_[component]_. > For memory related functions, rte_mem_ is better than rte_eal_.
Yes, I agree.
