Thanks. I will send the V2.

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Wisam Monther [mailto:wis...@mellanox.com] 
发送时间: 2020年6月30日 22:10
收件人: oulijun <ouli...@huawei.com>; dev@dpdk.org; ferruh.yi...@intel.com
抄送: Linuxarm <linux...@huawei.com>
主题: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: update uninitialized member when set 
fwd mode

Hi Lijun,


>-----Original Message-----
>From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Lijun Ou
>Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 4:25 PM
>To: dev@dpdk.org; ferruh.yi...@intel.com
>Cc: linux...@huawei.com
>Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: update uninitialized member 
>when set fwd mode

The member is actually initialized before so I think the title somehow 
misleading, What about: "fix missing set for current forward engine" 

>
>When set the forwarding mode of the pkt, it needs to update the fwd_eng 
>that it is the member of cur_fwd_config. Otherwise, an error will occur 
>when executing the set command and show confg fwd.
>the flows as follows:
>   1. ./tespmd -w xxx -l xx -n 4 -- i
>   2. set fwd mac
>      testpmd> set fwd mac
>      Set mac packet forwarding mode
>
>   3. show config fwd
>      testpmd> show config fwd
>      io packet forwarding - ports=1 - cores=1 - streams=8 -...
>      Logical Core 1 (socket 0) forwards packets on 8 streams:
>
>When run the 1 ~ 3 step, it should show the packet forwarding is mac.

I think this should be consider as a fix, and you need to add the fixed commit 
and cc It's auther

>
>Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <ouli...@huawei.com>
>---
> app/test-pmd/config.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c index
>a7112c9..ee0e904 100644
>--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
>+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
>@@ -3158,6 +3158,7 @@ set_pkt_forwarding_mode(const char
>*fwd_mode_name)
>                              fwd_mode_name,
>                              retry_enabled == 0 ? "" : " with retry");
>                       cur_fwd_eng = fwd_eng;
>+                      cur_fwd_config.fwd_eng = fwd_eng;
>                       return;
>               }
>               i++;
>--
>2.7.4

Reply via email to