Hi Honnappa,
> > Hi Konstantin, > It looks fine overall, few comments inline. > > <snip> > > > Subject: [PATCH] test/ring: add stress test for ST peek API > > > > Introduce new test case to test ST peek API. > > > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> > > --- > > > > This patch depends on the following patch: > > "ring: fix error vlaue of tail in the peek API for ST mode" > > (http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/72374/) > > to run successfully. > > > > app/test/Makefile | 1 + > > app/test/meson.build | 1 + > > app/test/test_ring_st_peek_stress.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > app/test/test_ring_stress.c | 3 ++ > > app/test/test_ring_stress.h | 1 + > > 5 files changed, 60 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 app/test/test_ring_st_peek_stress.c > > > > diff --git a/app/test/Makefile b/app/test/Makefile index > > 7b96a03a6..37bdaf891 100644 > > --- a/app/test/Makefile > > +++ b/app/test/Makefile > > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ SRCS-y += test_ring_hts_stress.c SRCS-y += > > test_ring_perf.c SRCS-y += test_ring_peek_stress.c SRCS-y += > > test_ring_rts_stress.c > > +SRCS-y += test_ring_st_peek_stress.c > > SRCS-y += test_ring_stress.c > > SRCS-y += test_pmd_perf.c > > > > diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build index > > 5233ead46..4ec7da6b2 100644 > > --- a/app/test/meson.build > > +++ b/app/test/meson.build > > @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ test_sources = files('commands.c', > > 'test_ring_peek_stress.c', > > 'test_ring_perf.c', > > 'test_ring_rts_stress.c', > > + 'test_ring_st_peek_stress.c', > I think we should rename test_ring_peek_stress.c to > test_ring_mpmc_hts_peek_stress.c to be consistent with this? Ok, maybe then: 'test_ring_st_peek_stress.c' and 'test_ring_mt_peek_stress.c' to keep naming convention the same? > > > 'test_ring_stress.c', > > 'test_rwlock.c', > > 'test_sched.c',
