Hi Patrick,
Few comments are inline,  others are fine to me.

Regards,
Marvin

> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c
> index 0d822d6..58ee3ef 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -332,8 +332,13 @@
>  {
>       if (vq_is_packed(dev))
>               rte_free(vq->shadow_used_packed);
> -     else
> +     else {
>               rte_free(vq->shadow_used_split);
> +             if (vq->async_pkts_pending)
> +                     rte_free(vq->async_pkts_pending);
> +             if (vq->async_pending_info)
> +                     rte_free(vq->async_pending_info);

Missed pointer set and feature set to 0. 


> +int rte_vhost_async_channel_unregister(int vid, uint16_t queue_id)
> +{
> +     struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> +     struct virtio_net *dev = get_device(vid);
> +     int ret = -1;
> +
> +     if (dev == NULL)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     vq = dev->virtqueue[queue_id];
> +
> +     if (vq == NULL)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     ret = 0;
> +     rte_spinlock_lock(&vq->access_lock);
> +
> +     if (!vq->async_registered)
> +             goto out;
> +
> +     if (vq->async_pkts_inflight_n) {
> +             VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR, "Failed to unregister async
> channel. "
> +                     "async inflight packets must be completed before
> unregistration.\n");
> +             ret = -1;
> +             goto out;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (vq->async_pkts_pending) {
> +             rte_free(vq->async_pkts_pending);
> +             vq->async_pkts_pending = 0;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (vq->async_pending_info) {
> +             rte_free(vq->async_pending_info);
> +             vq->async_pending_info = 0;
> +     }
> +

Please unify the async pending pointer check and free logic and pointer should 
be set to NULL.

> +     vq->async_ops.transfer_data = NULL;
> +     vq->async_ops.check_completed_copies = NULL;
> +     vq->async_registered = false;
> +
> +out:
> +     rte_spinlock_unlock(&vq->access_lock);
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +

Reply via email to