I'm sorry for a duplicate of my message from July, 13.
The problem is that I've not found my reply in patchwork and
mail thread. Now I found out that I'm replying to Ray's mail
and the mail is not in the thread since has invalid message
headers.
Andrew.
On 7/15/20 11:54 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 7/13/20 11:04 AM, Kinsella, Ray wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/07/2020 21:40, Andrey Vesnovaty wrote:
>>> From: Andrey Vesnovaty <andrey.vesnov...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> This commit introduces extension of DPDK flow action API enabling
>>> sharing of single rte_flow_action in multiple flows. The API intended for
>>> PMDs where multiple HW offloaded flows can reuse the same HW
>>> essence/object representing flow action and modification of such an
>>> essence/object effects all the rules using it.
>>>
>>> Motivation and example
>>> ===
>>> Adding or removing one or more queues to RSS used by multiple flow rules
>>> imposes per rule toll for current DPDK flow API; the scenario requires
>>> for each flow sharing cloned RSS action:
>>> - call `rte_flow_destroy()`
>>> - call `rte_flow_create()` with modified RSS action
>>>
>>> API for sharing action and its in-place update benefits:
>>> - reduce the overhead of multiple RSS flow rules reconfiguration
>
> It *allows* to reduce the overhead of multiple RSS flow rules
> reconfiguration. I.e. it is not mandatory. PMD may do it in SW,
> if HW does not support it. I see no problem to allow it.
> Even if it is done in PMD, it is already an optimization since
> applications have unified interface and internally it should
> be cheaper to do it.
> I'd consider to implement generic SW helper API for PMDs which
> cannot have shared actions in HW, but would like to simulate it
> in SW. It would allow to avoid the fallback in applications.
>
>>> - optimize resource utilization by sharing action across of multiple
>>> flows
>>>
>>> Change description
>>> ===
>>>
>>> Shared action
>>> ===
>>> In order to represent flow action shared by multiple flows new action
>>> type RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is introduced (see `enum
>>> rte_flow_action_type`).
>>> Actually the introduced API decouples action from any specific flow and
>>> enables sharing of single action by its handle across multiple flows.
>>>
>>> Shared action create/use/destroy
>>> ===
>>> Shared action may be reused by some or none flow rules at any given
>>> moment, i.e. shared action reside outside of the context of any flow.
>>> Shared action represent HW resources/objects used for action offloading
>>> implementation.
>>> API for shared action create (see `rte_flow_shared_action_create()`):
>>> - should allocate HW resources and make related initializations required
>>> for shared action implementation.
>>> - make necessary preparations to maintain shared access to
>>> the action resources, configuration and state.
>>> API for shared action destroy (see `rte_flow_shared_action_destroy()`)
>>> should release HW resources and make related cleanups required for shared
>>> action implementation.
>>>
>>> In order to share some flow action reuse the handle of type
>>> `struct rte_flow_shared_action` returned by
>>> rte_flow_shared_action_create() as a `conf` field of
>>> `struct rte_flow_action` (see "example" section).
>>>
>>> If some shared action not used by any flow rule all resources allocated
>>> by the shared action can be released by rte_flow_shared_action_destroy()
>>> (see "example" section). The shared action handle passed as argument to
>>> destroy API should not be used any further i.e. result of the usage is
>>> undefined.
>
> May be it makes sense to implement housekeeping in ethdev
> layer? I.e. guarantee consequency using reference counters etc.
> Will applications benefit from it?
>
>>>
>>> Shared action re-configuration
>>> ===
>>> Shared action behavior defined by its configuration can be updated via
>>> rte_flow_shared_action_update() (see "example" section). The shared
>>> action update operation modifies HW related resources/objects allocated
>>> on the action creation. The number of operations performed by the update
>>> operation should not be dependent on number of flows sharing the related
>>> action. On return of shared action update API action behavior should be
>>> according to updated configuration for all flows sharing the action.
>
> If shared action is simulated in SW, number of operations to do
> reconfiguration will depend on a number of flow rules using it.
> I think it is not a problem. So, *should not* used above is OK.
>
> Consider:
> "should not be dependent on" -> "should not depend on"
>
>>>
>>> Shared action query
>>> ===
>>> Provide separate API to query shared action sate (see
>
> sate -> state
>
>>> rte_flow_shared_action_update()). Taking a counter as an example: query
>>> returns value aggregating all counter increments across all flow rules
>>> sharing the counter.
>>>
>>> PMD support
>>> ===
>>> The support of introduced API is pure PMD specific design and
>>> responsibility for each action type (see struct rte_flow_ops).
>>>
>>> testpmd
>>> ===
>>> In order to utilize introduced API testpmd cli may implement following
>>> extension
>>> create/update/destroy/query shared action accordingly
>>>
>>> flow shared_action create {port_id} [index] {action}
>>> flow shared_action update {port_id} {index} {action}
>>> flow shared_action destroy {port_id} {index}
>>> flow shared_action query {port_id} {index}
>>>
>>> testpmd example
>>> ===
>>>
>>> configure rss to queues 1 & 2
>>>
>>> testpmd> flow shared_action create 0 100 rss 1 2
>>>
>>> create flow rule utilizing shared action
>>>
>>> testpmd> flow create 0 ingress \
>>> pattern eth dst is 0c:42:a1:15:fd:ac / ipv6 / tcp / end \
>>> actions shared 100 end / end
>>>
>>> add 2 more queues
>>>
>>> testpmd> flow shared_action modify 0 100 rss 1 2 3 4
>>>
>>> example
>>> ===
>>>
>>> struct rte_flow_action actions[2];
>>> struct rte_flow_action action;
>>> /* skipped: initialize action */
>>> struct rte_flow_shared_action *handle = rte_flow_shared_action_create(
>>> port_id, &action, &error);
>
> It should be possible to have many actions in shared action.
> I.e. similar to below, it should be an array terminated by
> RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END. It is unclear from the example
> above.
>
>>> actions[0].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED;
>>> actions[0].conf = handle;
>>> actions[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END;
>>> /* skipped: init attr0 & pattern0 args */
>>> struct rte_flow *flow0 = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attr0, pattern0,
>>> actions, error);
>>> /* create more rules reusing shared action */
>>> struct rte_flow *flow1 = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attr1, pattern1,
>>> actions, error);
>>> /* skipped: for flows 2 till N */
>>> struct rte_flow *flowN = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attrN, patternN,
>>> actions, error);
>>> /* update shared action */
>>> struct rte_flow_action updated_action;
>>> /*
>>> * skipped: initialize updated_action according to desired action
>>> * configuration change
>>> */
>>> rte_flow_shared_action_update(port_id, handle, &updated_action, error);
>>> /*
>>> * from now on all flows 1 till N will act according to configuration of
>>> * updated_action
>>> */
>>> /* skipped: destroy all flows 1 till N */
>>> rte_flow_shared_action_destroy(port_id, handle, error);
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Vesnovaty <andr...@mellanox.com>
>>> ---
>>> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_version.map | 6 +
>>> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c | 81 +++++++++++++
>>> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow_driver.h | 22 ++++
>>> 4 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_version.map
>>> b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_version.map
>>> index 7155056045..119d84976a 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_version.map
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_version.map
>>> @@ -241,4 +241,10 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
>>> __rte_ethdev_trace_rx_burst;
>>> __rte_ethdev_trace_tx_burst;
>>> rte_flow_get_aged_flows;
>>> +
>>> + # added in 20.08
>>> + rte_flow_shared_action_create;
>>> + rte_flow_shared_action_destroy;
>>> + rte_flow_shared_action_update;
>>> + rte_flow_shared_action_query;
>>> };
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c
>>> index 1685be5f73..0ac4d31a13 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c
>>> @@ -1250,3 +1250,84 @@ rte_flow_get_aged_flows(uint16_t port_id, void
>>> **contexts,
>>> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
>>> NULL, rte_strerror(ENOTSUP));
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +struct rte_flow_shared_action *
>>> +rte_flow_shared_action_create(uint16_t port_id,
>>> + const struct rte_flow_action *action,
>>> + struct rte_flow_error *error)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
>>> + struct rte_flow_shared_action *shared_action;
>>> + const struct rte_flow_ops *ops = rte_flow_ops_get(port_id, error);
>>> +
>>> + if (unlikely(!ops))
>>> + return NULL;
>>> + if (likely(!!ops->shared_action_create)) {
>>> + shared_action = ops->shared_action_create(dev, action, error);
>>> + if (shared_action == NULL)
>>> + flow_err(port_id, -rte_errno, error);
>>> + return shared_action;
>>> + }
>>> + rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
>>> + NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +rte_flow_shared_action_destroy(uint16_t port_id,
>>> + struct rte_flow_shared_action *action,
>>> + struct rte_flow_error *error)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
>>> + const struct rte_flow_ops *ops = rte_flow_ops_get(port_id, error);
>>> +
>>> + if (unlikely(!ops))
>>> + return -rte_errno;
>>> + if (likely(!!ops->shared_action_destroy))
>>> + return flow_err(port_id,
>>> + ops->shared_action_destroy(dev, action, error),
>>> + error);
>>> + return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS,
>>> + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
>>> + NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +rte_flow_shared_action_update(uint16_t port_id,
>>> + struct rte_flow_shared_action *action,
>>> + const struct rte_flow_action *update,
>>> + struct rte_flow_error *error)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
>>> + const struct rte_flow_ops *ops = rte_flow_ops_get(port_id, error);
>>> +
>>> + if (unlikely(!ops))
>>> + return -rte_errno;
>>> + if (likely(!!ops->shared_action_update))
>>> + return flow_err(port_id, ops->shared_action_update(dev, action,
>>> + update, error),
>>> + error);
>>> + return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS,
>>> + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
>>> + NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +rte_flow_shared_action_query(uint16_t port_id,
>>> + const struct rte_flow_shared_action *action,
>>> + void *data,
>>> + struct rte_flow_error *error)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
>>> + const struct rte_flow_ops *ops = rte_flow_ops_get(port_id, error);
>>> +
>>> + if (unlikely(!ops))
>>> + return -rte_errno;
>>> + if (likely(!!ops->shared_action_query))
>>> + return flow_err(port_id, ops->shared_action_query(dev, action,
>>> + data, error),
>>> + error);
>>> + return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOSYS,
>>> + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
>>> + NULL, rte_strerror(ENOSYS));
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
>>> index b0e4199192..257456b14a 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
>>> @@ -1681,7 +1681,8 @@ enum rte_flow_action_type {
>>> /**
>>> * Enables counters for this flow rule.
>>> *
>>> - * These counters can be retrieved and reset through rte_flow_query(),
>>> + * These counters can be retrieved and reset through rte_flow_query() or
>>> + * rte_flow_shared_action_query() if the action provided via handle,
>>> * see struct rte_flow_query_count.
>>> *
>>> * See struct rte_flow_action_count.
>>> @@ -2099,6 +2100,14 @@ enum rte_flow_action_type {
>>> * see enum RTE_ETH_EVENT_FLOW_AGED
>>> */
>>> RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_AGE,
>>> +
>>> + /**
>>> + * Describes action shared a cross multiple flow rules.
>
> Both options are possible, but I'd propose to stick to:
> Describes -> Describe
>
> Or even:
> Use actions shared across multiple flow rules.
>
>>> + *
>>> + * Enables multiple rules reference the same action by handle (see
>
> Enables -> Allow
>
>>> + * struct rte_flow_shared_action).
>>> + */
>>> + RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED,
>>> };
>>> /**
>>> @@ -2660,6 +2669,20 @@ struct rte_flow_action_set_dscp {
>>> uint8_t dscp;
>>> };
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED
>>> + *
>>> + * Opaque type returned after successfully creating a shared action.
>>> + *
>>> + * This handle can be used to manage and query the related action:
>>> + * - share it a cross multiple flow rules
>>> + * - update action configuration
>>> + * - query action data
>>> + * - destroy action
>>> + */
>>> +struct rte_flow_shared_action;
>>> +
>>> /* Mbuf dynamic field offset for metadata. */
>>> extern int32_t rte_flow_dynf_metadata_offs;
>>> @@ -3324,6 +3347,129 @@ int
>>> rte_flow_get_aged_flows(uint16_t port_id, void **contexts,
>>> uint32_t nb_contexts, struct rte_flow_error *error);
>>> +/**
>>> + * @warning
>>> + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
>>> + *
>>> + * Create shared action for reuse in multiple flow rules.
>>> + *
>>> + * @param[in] port_id
>>> + * The port identifier of the Ethernet device.
>>> + * @param[in] action
>>> + * Action configuration for shared action creation.
>>> + * @param[out] error
>>> + * Perform verbose error reporting if not NULL. PMDs initialize this
>>> + * structure in case of error only.
>>> + * @return
>>> + * A valid handle in case of success, NULL otherwise and rte_errno
>>> is set
>>> + * to one of the error codes defined:
>>> + * - (ENOSYS) if underlying device does not support this functionality.
>>> + * - (EIO) if underlying device is removed.
>>> + * - (EINVAL) if *action* invalid.
>>> + * - (ENOTSUP) if *action* valid but unsupported.
>>> + */
>>> +__rte_experimental
>>> +struct rte_flow_shared_action *
>>> +rte_flow_shared_action_create(uint16_t port_id,
>>> + const struct rte_flow_action *action,
>>> + struct rte_flow_error *error);
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * @warning
>>> + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
>>> + *
>>> + * Destroys the shared action by handle.
>
> Destroys -> Destroy
>
>>> + *
>>> + * @param[in] port_id
>>> + * The port identifier of the Ethernet device.
>>> + * @param[in] action
>>> + * Handle for the shared action to be destroyed.
>>> + * @param[out] error
>>> + * Perform verbose error reporting if not NULL. PMDs initialize this
>>> + * structure in case of error only.
>>> + * @return
>>> + * - (0) if success.
>>> + * - (-ENOSYS) if underlying device does not support this functionality.
>>> + * - (-EIO) if underlying device is removed.
>>> + * - (-ENOENT) if action pointed by *action* handle was not found.
>>> + * - (-ETOOMANYREFS) if action pointed by *action* handle still used
>>> by one or
>>> + * more rules
>>> + * rte_errno is also set.
>>> + */
>>> +__rte_experimental
>>> +int
>>> +rte_flow_shared_action_destroy(uint16_t port_id,
>>> + struct rte_flow_shared_action *action,
>>> + struct rte_flow_error *error);
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * @warning
>>> + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
>>> + *
>>> + * Updates inplace the shared action configuration pointed by
>>> *action* handle
>
> Updates -> Update
> inplace -> in-place
>
>>> + * with the configuration provided as *update* argument.
>>> + * The update of the shared action configuration effects all flow
>>> rules reusing
>
> May be: reusing -> using
>
>>> + * the action via handle.
>
> The interesting question what to do, if some rule cannot have a
> new action (i.e. new action is invalid for a rule).
> May be it is better to highlight it.
>
>>> + *
>>> + * @param[in] port_id
>>> + * The port identifier of the Ethernet device.
>>> + * @param[in] action
>>> + * Handle for the shared action to be updated.
>>> + * @param[in] update
>>> + * Action specification used to modify the action pointed by handle.
>>> + * *update* should be of same type with the action pointed by the
>>> *action*
>>> + * handle argument, otherwise considered as invalid.
>
> Why? If it is a generic rule, it should be checked on a generic
> ethdev layer, but I would not impose the limitation. If PMD
> may change it, why generic interface specification should
> restrict it.
>
>>> + * @param[out] error
>>> + * Perform verbose error reporting if not NULL. PMDs initialize this
>>> + * structure in case of error only.
>>> + * @return
>>> + * - (0) if success.
>>> + * - (-ENOSYS) if underlying device does not support this functionality.
>>> + * - (-EIO) if underlying device is removed.
>>> + * - (-EINVAL) if *update* invalid.
>>> + * - (-ENOTSUP) if *update* valid but unsupported.
>>> + * - (-ENOENT) if action pointed by *ctx* was not found.
>>> + * rte_errno is also set.
>>> + */
>>> +__rte_experimental
>>> +int
>>> +rte_flow_shared_action_update(uint16_t port_id,
>>> + struct rte_flow_shared_action *action,
>>> + const struct rte_flow_action *update,
>>> + struct rte_flow_error *error);
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * @warning
>>> + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
>>> + *
>>> + * Query the shared action by handle.
>>> + *
>>> + * This function allows retrieving action-specific data such as
>>> counters.
>
> "This function allows retrieving" -> Retrieve or Get or Query
>
>>> + * Data is gathered by special action which may be present/referenced in
>>> + * more than one flow rule definition.
>>> + *
>>> + * \see RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_COUNT
>>> + *
>>> + * @param port_id
>>> + * Port identifier of Ethernet device.
>>> + * @param[in] action
>>> + * Handle for the shared action to query.
>>> + * @param[in, out] data
>>> + * Pointer to storage for the associated query data type.
>>> + * @param[out] error
>>> + * Perform verbose error reporting if not NULL. PMDs initialize this
>>> + * structure in case of error only.
>>> + *
>>> + * @return
>>> + * 0 on success, a negative errno value otherwise and rte_errno is set.
>>> + */
>>> +__rte_experimental
>>> +int
>>> +rte_flow_shared_action_query(uint16_t port_id,
>>> + const struct rte_flow_shared_action *action,
>>> + void *data,
>>> + struct rte_flow_error *error);
>>> +
>>> #ifdef __cplusplus
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow_driver.h
>>> b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow_driver.h
>>> index 881cc469b7..a2cae1b53c 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow_driver.h
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow_driver.h
>>> @@ -107,6 +107,28 @@ struct rte_flow_ops {
>>> void **context,
>>> uint32_t nb_contexts,
>>> struct rte_flow_error *err);
>>> + /** See rte_flow_shared_action_create() */
>>> + struct rte_flow_shared_action *(*shared_action_create)
>>> + (struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>> + const struct rte_flow_action *action,
>>> + struct rte_flow_error *error);
>>> + /** See rte_flow_shared_action_destroy() */
>>> + int (*shared_action_destroy)
>>> + (struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>> + struct rte_flow_shared_action *shared_action,
>>> + struct rte_flow_error *error);
>>> + /** See rte_flow_shared_action_update() */
>>> + int (*shared_action_update)
>>> + (struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>> + struct rte_flow_shared_action *shared_action,
>>> + const struct rte_flow_action *update,
>>> + struct rte_flow_error *error);
>>> + /** See rte_flow_shared_action_query() */
>>> + int (*shared_action_query)
>>> + (struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>> + const struct rte_flow_shared_action *shared_action,
>>> + void *data,
>>> + struct rte_flow_error *error);
>>> };
>>> /**
>>>
>>
>> The modification of "struct rte_flow_ops", looks fine.
>> Acked-by: Ray Kinsella <m...@ashroe.eu>
>>
>
