<snip>
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] devtools: prevent use of rte
> > > atomic APIs in future patches
> > >
> > > 16/07/2020 12:48, David Marchand:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 6:58 AM Phil Yang <phil.y...@arm.com> wrote:
> > > > > check_forbidden_additions() { # <patch>
> > > > > res=0
> > > > > + c11_atomics_dir="lib/librte_distributor lib/librte_hash
> lib/librte_kni
> > > > > + lib/librte_lpm lib/librte_rcu lib/librte_ring
> > > > > + lib/librte_stack lib/librte_vhost
> > > > > + drivers/event/octeontx
> > > > > drivers/event/octeontx2
> > > > > + drivers/event/opdl drivers/net/bnx2x
> > > > > drivers/net/hinic
> > > > > + drivers/net/hns3 drivers/net/memif
> drivers/net/thunderx
> > > > > + drivers/net/virtio examples/l2fwd-event"
> > > >
> > > > I prefer a form like:
> > > >
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir=""
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir drivers/event/octeontx"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir drivers/event/octeontx2"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir drivers/event/opdl"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir drivers/net/bnx2x"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir drivers/net/hinic"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir drivers/net/hns3"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir drivers/net/memif"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir drivers/net/thunderx"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir drivers/net/virtio"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir examples/l2fwd-event"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir lib/librte_distributor"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir lib/librte_hash"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir lib/librte_kni"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir lib/librte_lpm"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir lib/librte_rcu"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir lib/librte_ring"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir lib/librte_stack"
> > > > + c11_atomics_dir="$c11_atomics_dir lib/librte_vhost"
> > > >
> > > > Easier to read and update.
> > >
> > > Why do we need this list at all?
> > > Are we allowed to add new code with old atomics in other
> > > directories?
> > > How bad it is to have a warning on non-converted libs?
> >
> > From my perspective, the pros of this list are :
> > 1. Avoid introducing false warnings in non-converted modules. Otherwise,
> the maintainers have to wonder if that module is converted or not.
>
> Don't we want to convert all libs?
The goal is to convert all the libs.
> If we are adding one more rte_atomic in a lib, we should ask the question
> why not converting to C11, no?
Agree, I am fine with this approach. That will kind of distribute the
conversion work as well.
>
> > 2. Keep non-converted modules compatible. C11 atomic builtins cannot be
> used directly for rte_atomicXX_t variables.
> >
> > The cons are :
> > 1. The list needs updating every time we convert a module.
This list will go away once all the modules are converted.
> > 2. The script is not elegant as before.
>
>
