On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:25 PM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: > > I vote for applying this patch series, > because it does not change what we have, > except printing a warning in case python3 > is neither explicitly called, nor the default. > > I consider it is a good step, > and I don't see the extra warning as a severe annoyance.
Users can call the scripts with the right interpreter if the warning is too much for them and they don't want to switch their whole system to python3. +1 for this series. -- David Marchand
