On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 6:10 AM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote:
> > In addition may I ask your opinion on the changes that are required > > before the library can be accepted? > > Very few contributors take time to look at it. > Clearly we want this feature. We really want it, > but we are not able to dedicate enough time for its review (blaming myself). > That's why I Cc the techboard to try a new process: > > For such feature requiring a community design, > and not having enough feedback to progress in a timely manner, > I propose drafting the design in a Technical Board meeting > (a regular or specific one). Since the patch series already have the documentation for library[1], example application [2] in addition to the implementation. For everyone's benefit, it would good to know what is the expectation of draft design so that one can create such a document as part of the new process and it can apply for new another library. [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/71953/ [2] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/71956/ > >
