On 8/8/2020 8:45 AM, liqingqing wrote:
> fix coredump when secondary process using the hinic port.
> the reason is that during the stage of
> secondary process port initialization,
> it lack the initialization of "eth_dev->dev_ops".
>
> Signed-off-by: liqingqing <liqingqi...@huawei.com>
Hi,
Overall patch looks good but can you please add your name and surname to the
sign off, to make it following syntax:
Signed-off-by: Name Surname <liqingqi...@huawei.com>
Also what do you think about following patch title:
"net/hinic: fix crash in secondary process"
> ---
> v2: solve the coding style issue.
> ---
> drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c
> index 67e6afcf7..26c6098d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c
> @@ -3060,15 +3060,6 @@ static int hinic_func_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> int rc;
>
> pci_dev = RTE_ETH_DEV_TO_PCI(eth_dev);
> -
> - /* EAL is SECONDARY and eth_dev is already created */
> - if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
> - PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "Initialize %s in secondary process",
> - eth_dev->data->name);
> -
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> nic_dev = HINIC_ETH_DEV_TO_PRIVATE_NIC_DEV(eth_dev);
> memset(nic_dev, 0, sizeof(*nic_dev));
>
> @@ -3206,6 +3197,18 @@ static int hinic_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = hinic_recv_pkts;
> eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = hinic_xmit_pkts;
>
> + /* EAL is SECONDARY and eth_dev is already created */
> + if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
> + PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "Initialize %s in secondary process",
> eth_dev->data->name);
> +
> + struct hinic_nic_dev *nic_dev =
> HINIC_ETH_DEV_TO_PRIVATE_NIC_DEV(eth_dev);
> + if (HINIC_IS_VF(nic_dev->hwdev))
> + eth_dev->dev_ops = &hinic_pmd_vf_ops;
> + else
> + eth_dev->dev_ops = &hinic_pmd_ops;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> return hinic_func_init(eth_dev);
> }
>
