On 10/09/2020 09:05, Nithin Dabilpuram wrote: > This patch marks all traffic manager API as experimental as > per discussion mentioned in below thread. > > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-April/165364.html > > Signed-off-by: Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpu...@marvell.com> > --- > > v2: > - Updated commit message. > > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_version.map | 62 > ++++++++++++++++---------------- > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_tm.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_version.map > b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_version.map > index 1212a17..3da4512 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_version.map > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_version.map > @@ -135,36 +135,6 @@ DPDK_20.0 { > rte_flow_isolate; > rte_flow_query; > rte_flow_validate; > - rte_tm_capabilities_get; > - rte_tm_get_number_of_leaf_nodes; > - rte_tm_hierarchy_commit; > - rte_tm_level_capabilities_get; > - rte_tm_mark_ip_dscp; > - rte_tm_mark_ip_ecn; > - rte_tm_mark_vlan_dei; > - rte_tm_node_add; > - rte_tm_node_capabilities_get; > - rte_tm_node_cman_update; > - rte_tm_node_delete; > - rte_tm_node_parent_update; > - rte_tm_node_resume; > - rte_tm_node_shaper_update; > - rte_tm_node_shared_shaper_update; > - rte_tm_node_shared_wred_context_update; > - rte_tm_node_stats_read; > - rte_tm_node_stats_update; > - rte_tm_node_suspend; > - rte_tm_node_type_get; > - rte_tm_node_wfq_weight_mode_update; > - rte_tm_node_wred_context_update; > - rte_tm_shaper_profile_add; > - rte_tm_shaper_profile_delete; > - rte_tm_shared_shaper_add_update; > - rte_tm_shared_shaper_delete; > - rte_tm_shared_wred_context_add_update; > - rte_tm_shared_wred_context_delete; > - rte_tm_wred_profile_add; > - rte_tm_wred_profile_delete; > > local: *; > }; > @@ -241,6 +211,38 @@ EXPERIMENTAL { > __rte_ethdev_trace_rx_burst; > __rte_ethdev_trace_tx_burst; > rte_flow_get_aged_flows; > + > + # Marked as experimental in 20.11 > + rte_tm_capabilities_get; > + rte_tm_get_number_of_leaf_nodes; > + rte_tm_hierarchy_commit; > + rte_tm_level_capabilities_get; > + rte_tm_mark_ip_dscp; > + rte_tm_mark_ip_ecn; > + rte_tm_mark_vlan_dei; > + rte_tm_node_add; > + rte_tm_node_capabilities_get; > + rte_tm_node_cman_update; > + rte_tm_node_delete; > + rte_tm_node_parent_update; > + rte_tm_node_resume; > + rte_tm_node_shaper_update; > + rte_tm_node_shared_shaper_update; > + rte_tm_node_shared_wred_context_update; > + rte_tm_node_stats_read; > + rte_tm_node_stats_update; > + rte_tm_node_suspend; > + rte_tm_node_type_get; > + rte_tm_node_wfq_weight_mode_update; > + rte_tm_node_wred_context_update; > + rte_tm_shaper_profile_add; > + rte_tm_shaper_profile_delete; > + rte_tm_shared_shaper_add_update; > + rte_tm_shared_shaper_delete; > + rte_tm_shared_wred_context_add_update; > + rte_tm_shared_wred_context_delete; > + rte_tm_wred_profile_add; > + rte_tm_wred_profile_delete; > }; [SNIP]
So I will re-interate what I said in April, all of these API have existed since DPDK 17.08. I find it hard to believe they are all at imminent risk of changing to degree they _all_ warrant EXPERIMENTAL status. Ray K