On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 4:58 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote: > > On 9/16/2020 5:21 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:28 PM Ajit Khaparde > > <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com> wrote: > >> > >> Some fixes and enhancements in the PMD and TruFlow layers. > >> > >> v1->v2: > >> - rebased to latest > >> - updated commit messages > > Applied to dpdk-next-net-brcm. > > > >> > >> Kishore Padmanabha (14): > >> net/bnxt: fix port stop process and cleanup resources > >> net/bnxt: fix the drop action flow to support count > >> net/bnxt: reject flow offload with invalid MAC > >> net/bnxt: reduce debug log messages > >> net/bnxt: fix coexistence of ipv4 and ipv6 ingress rules > >> net/bnxt: modify default flow rule creation > >> net/bnxt: fix the function id used in flow flush > >> net/bnxt: refactor VFR port clean up > >> net/bnxt: remove VLAN pop action for egress flows > >> net/bnxt: increase counter support from 8K to 16K > >> net/bnxt: enable VXLAN ipv6 encapsulation > >> net/bnxt: enable NAT action with tagged traffic > >> net/bnxt: fix out of bound access in bit handling > >> net/bnxt: add locks in flow database > >> > >> Mike Baucom (1): > >> net/bnxt: free the EM index on failure > >> > >> Randy Schacher (1): > >> net/bnxt: use direct HWRM message for interface table > >> > >> Shahaji Bhosle (2): > >> net/bnxt: add null pointer check for resource manager > >> net/bnxt: update resource settings > >> > >> Somnath Kotur (6): > >> net/bnxt: fix crash in VFR queue select > >> net/bnxt: fix VFR cleanup during init failure > >> net/bnxt: check and set initial counter ID > >> net/bnxt: fix bugs in representor data path > >> net/bnxt: fix to check VNIC in shutdown path > >> net/bnxt: add separate mutex for FW health check > >> > >> Sriharsha Basavapatna (1): > >> net/bnxt: provide switch info if VFR are configured > >> > > Hi Ajit, > > I assume the backporting of the majority of the patchset explicitly not > requested, since two of them has stable tag but rest don't, but I would > like to confirm. > > And I suggest backporting fixes as much as possible, since missing some > fixes may cause conflict for future fixes and prevent backporting them. Hi Ferruh, Most of the fixes are actually for changes made in 20.08 Since it is not an LTS, I think not really porting them should not be a problem. But if there is any patch which needs to go into earlier LTS releases, I will add it to the list of backports.
Thanks for checking. Ajit > >
