On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:33:21 +0200 Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> wrote:
> 2015-06-11 09:27, Simon Kagstrom: > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:39:59 +0200 > > Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> wrote: > > > > I didn't find this in the list: > > > > rte_reorder: Allow sequence numbers > 0 as starting point > > It was considered more or less as a fix. > > > and I think it would be good to have as well. > > Yes of course. OK, thanks! It would be good to have some sort of feedback on accepted patches though - in addition to the above one, I also sent a build-fix kni: Use utsrelease.h to determine Ubuntu kernel version which I also think would be good to have (basically, building in a chroot is broken otherwise). I haven't had time to test the patch on older Ubuntus though. So, while this is an old discussion by now, I think DPDK is large enough to warrant some more infrastructure for patch submissions - at least in the form of build-tests for patches, and preferrably some sort of status marker for accepted patches. Basically what Github/Travis-ci etc already provides. // Simon
