On 1/14/2022 3:10 AM, John Daley wrote:
Newer VIC adapters have the max number of supported RX and TX
descriptors in their configuration. Use these values as the
maximums.
Signed-off-by: John Daley <johnd...@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: Hyong Youb Kim <hyon...@cisco.com>
<...>
diff --git a/drivers/net/enic/enic_res.h b/drivers/net/enic/enic_res.h
index 34f15d5a42..ae979d52be 100644
--- a/drivers/net/enic/enic_res.h
+++ b/drivers/net/enic/enic_res.h
@@ -12,9 +12,11 @@
#include "vnic_rq.h"
#define ENIC_MIN_WQ_DESCS 64
-#define ENIC_MAX_WQ_DESCS 4096
There are still 'ENIC_MAX_WQ_DESCS' usage remaining in the code, causing build
error, can you please fix.
../drivers/net/enic/enic_rxtx.c: In function ‘enic_free_wq_bufs’:
../drivers/net/enic/enic_rxtx.c:397:46: error: ‘ENIC_MAX_WQ_DESCS’ undeclared
(first use in this function); did you mean ‘ENIC_MIN_WQ_DESCS’?
397 | RTE_ASSERT(nb_free < ENIC_MAX_WQ_DESCS);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../lib/eal/include/rte_branch_prediction.h:38:45: note: in definition of macro
‘unlikely’
38 | #define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
| ^
../lib/eal/include/rte_debug.h:47:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘RTE_VERIFY’
47 | #define RTE_ASSERT(exp) RTE_VERIFY(exp)
| ^~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/net/enic/enic_rxtx.c:397:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘RTE_ASSERT’
397 | RTE_ASSERT(nb_free < ENIC_MAX_WQ_DESCS);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/net/enic/enic_rxtx.c:397:46: note: each undeclared identifier is
reported only once for each function it appears in
397 | RTE_ASSERT(nb_free < ENIC_MAX_WQ_DESCS);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../lib/eal/include/rte_branch_prediction.h:38:45: note: in definition of macro
‘unlikely’
38 | #define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
| ^
../lib/eal/include/rte_debug.h:47:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘RTE_VERIFY’
47 | #define RTE_ASSERT(exp) RTE_VERIFY(exp)
| ^~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/net/enic/enic_rxtx.c:397:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘RTE_ASSERT’
397 | RTE_ASSERT(nb_free < ENIC_MAX_WQ_DESCS);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
