> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ori Kam <or...@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 4:13 PM
> To: Alexander Kozyrev <akozy...@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Suanming Mou <suanmi...@nvidia.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix flow creation parsing
> 
> Hi Alexander,
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alexander Kozyrev <akozy...@nvidia.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix flow creation parsing
> >
> > A pattern template creation shares the parsing mechanism with a simple
> > flow creation. The pattern template creation only consists of pattern
> > items while the flow creation continues with actions.
> > The parsing mechanism now accommodates both cases and allows to stop
> > at the item end token, which should not happen for the flow creation.
> > Fix parsing mechanism to differentiate between these two cases.
> >
> > Bugzilla ID: 941
> > Fixes: 04cc665fab ("app/testpmd: add flow template management")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozy...@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > index 4f7a9f17f9..fc4a6d9cca 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > @@ -6864,6 +6864,14 @@ parse_vc(struct context *ctx, const struct token
> *token,
> >             ctx->object = out->args.vc.pattern;
> >             ctx->objmask = NULL;
> >             return len;
> > +   case ITEM_END:
> > +           if ((out->command == VALIDATE || out->command == CREATE) &&
> > +               ctx->last)
> > +                   return -1;
> > +           if (out->command == PATTERN_TEMPLATE_CREATE &&
> > +               !ctx->last)
> > +                   return -1;
> > +           break;
> >     case ACTIONS:
> >             out->args.vc.actions =
> >                     (void *)RTE_ALIGN_CEIL((uintptr_t)
> > --
> > 2.18.2
> 
> 
> Acked-by: Ori Kam <or...@nvidia.com>
> Thanks,
> Ori

Tested-by: Zhimin Huang <zhiminx.hu...@intel.com >


Reply via email to