zhichaox.z...@intel.com writes:
> From: zhichao zeng <zhichaox.z...@intel.com>
>
> Promote the MDIO APIs to be stable.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhichao zeng <zhichaox.z...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ixgbe/rte_pmd_ixgbe.h | 5 -----
> drivers/net/ixgbe/version.map | 10 +++++-----
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/rte_pmd_ixgbe.h
> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/rte_pmd_ixgbe.h
> index eef6f6661c..426fe5845b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/rte_pmd_ixgbe.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/rte_pmd_ixgbe.h
> @@ -586,7 +586,6 @@ int rte_pmd_ixgbe_bypass_wd_reset(uint16_t port);
> * - (-ENODEV) if *port* invalid.
> * - (IXGBE_ERR_SWFW_SYNC) If sw/fw semaphore acquisition failed
> */
> -__rte_experimental
> int
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_lock(uint16_t port);
>
> @@ -600,7 +599,6 @@ rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_lock(uint16_t port);
> * - (-ENOTSUP) if hardware doesn't support.
> * - (-ENODEV) if *port* invalid.
> */
> -__rte_experimental
> int
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_unlock(uint16_t port);
>
> @@ -622,7 +620,6 @@ rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_unlock(uint16_t port);
> * - (-ENODEV) if *port* invalid.
> * - (IXGBE_ERR_PHY) If PHY read command failed
> */
> -__rte_experimental
> int
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_unlocked_read(uint16_t port, uint32_t reg_addr,
> uint32_t dev_type, uint16_t *phy_data);
> @@ -646,7 +643,6 @@ rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_unlocked_read(uint16_t port, uint32_t
> reg_addr,
> * - (-ENODEV) if *port* invalid.
> * - (IXGBE_ERR_PHY) If PHY read command failed
> */
> -__rte_experimental
> int
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_unlocked_write(uint16_t port, uint32_t reg_addr,
> uint32_t dev_type, uint16_t phy_data);
> @@ -725,7 +721,6 @@ enum {
> * - (-ENODEV) if *port* invalid.
> * - (-ENOTSUP) if hardware doesn't support this feature.
> */
> -__rte_experimental
> int
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_upd_fctrl_sbp(uint16_t port, int enable);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/version.map b/drivers/net/ixgbe/version.map
> index bca5cc5826..f0f29d8749 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/version.map
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/version.map
> @@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ DPDK_22 {
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_macsec_enable;
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_macsec_select_rxsa;
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_macsec_select_txsa;
Promoted APIs should be part of the DPDK_23 ABI, not DPDK_22.
David - I just did some checking and noted that we have been promoting
directly from experimental to DPDK 22, and that we did the same for DPDK
21. However in the DPDK_20 we (rightly) promoted to DPDK_21, new APIs
are promoted to being stable in the next ABI release.
Was that I conscious decision? I don't thinking there is impact by the
error / change, beyond house keeping.
> + rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_lock;
> + rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_unlock;
> + rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_unlocked_read;
> + rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_unlocked_write;
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_ping_vf;
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_all_queues_drop_en;
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_tc_bw_alloc;
> @@ -31,6 +35,7 @@ DPDK_22 {
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_vlan_filter;
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_vlan_insert;
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_vlan_stripq;
> + rte_pmd_ixgbe_upd_fctrl_sbp;
>
> local: *;
> };
> @@ -40,9 +45,4 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
>
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_get_fdir_info;
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_get_fdir_stats;
> - rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_lock;
> - rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_unlock;
> - rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_unlocked_read;
> - rte_pmd_ixgbe_mdio_unlocked_write;
> - rte_pmd_ixgbe_upd_fctrl_sbp;
> };
--
Regards, Ray K
