> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Peng1X <peng1x.zh...@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 9:49 AM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming
> <qiming.y...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] net/ice: retry sending adminQ command after failure
>
> I see, so ice_aq_retry_send_cmd function will conduct whether DCF is
> enabled or not with 'hw->dcf_enabled'.
Why not just enable retry in ice_dcf_send_aq_cmd?
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2022 7:52 PM
> > To: Zhang, Peng1X <peng1x.zh...@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming
> > <qiming.y...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] net/ice: retry sending adminQ command after
> > failure
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Zhang, Peng1X <peng1x.zh...@intel.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 1:48 AM
> > > To: Yang, Qiming <qiming.y...@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> > > <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Zhang, Peng1X <peng1x.zh...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: [PATCH v4] net/ice: retry sending adminQ command after
> > > failure
> > >
> > > From: Peng Zhang <peng1x.zh...@intel.com>
> > >
> > > The origin design is if error happen during the step 3 of following
> > > given situation, it will return error directly without retry. While
> > > in current patch, it will retry again and again during certain time.
> > > If retry succeed, rule can be continuously created. It will improve
> > > success rate of creating rule under following given situation.
> > >
> > > The given situation as following steps show:
> > > step 1. Kernel PF and DCF are ready at the beginning.
> > > step 2. A VF reset happen, kernel send an event to DPDK DCF and set
> > > STATE to pause.
> > > step 3. Before DPDK DCF receive the event, it is possible a rule
> > > creation is ongoing and switch rules, recipe, or vsi list related
> > > adminQ operation is executing.
> > > step 4. Then result of operation is failure, it will lead to error
> > > return to DPDK DCF. DPDK DCF error code will be set as EINVAL, not
> EAGAIN.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 6bad5047be24 ("net/ice/base: return correct error code")
> > > Fixes: 453d087ccaff ("net/ice/base: add common functions")
> > > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Zhang <peng1x.zh...@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > v4 changes:
> > > - Add retry mechanism if fail to send adminQ command under given
> > situation.
> > > v3 Changes:
> > > - Add the situation description, expected error code and incorrect
> > > error code
> > > - in commit log.
> > > v2 Changes:
> > > - Modify DCF state checking mechanism.
> > >
> > > drivers/net/ice/base/ice_common.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c |
> > > 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.h
> > > | 5
> > > ++++
> > > 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_common.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_common.c
> > > index db87bacd97..013c255371 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_common.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_common.c
> > > @@ -2127,7 +2127,7 @@ ice_aq_alloc_free_res(struct ice_hw *hw, u16
> > > num_entries,
> > >
> > > cmd->num_entries = CPU_TO_LE16(num_entries);
> > >
> > > - return ice_aq_send_cmd(hw, &desc, buf, buf_size, cd);
> > > + return ice_aq_retry_send_cmd(hw, &desc, buf, buf_size, cd);
> >
> > this is the fix only for DCF, we don't need to retry in a PF driver context.
> > Better keep the same function name, but implements the retry mechanism
> > inside the function, and should only be triggered when it is in a DCF
> > context
