On 5/6/2015 2:38 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue,  5 May 2015 13:39:42 +0800
> Cunming Liang <cunming.liang at intel.com> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c 
>> b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
>> index aea1fb1..387f54c 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
>> @@ -308,6 +308,18 @@ pci_vfio_setup_interrupts(struct rte_pci_device *dev, 
>> int vfio_dev_fd)
>>              case VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX:
>>                      internal_config.vfio_intr_mode = RTE_INTR_MODE_MSIX;
>>                      dev->intr_handle.type = RTE_INTR_HANDLE_VFIO_MSIX;
>> +                    for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_RXTX_INTR_VEC_ID; i++) {
>> +                            fd = eventfd(0, 0);
>> +                            if (fd < 0) {
>> +
> You should pass EFD_NONBLOCK and EFD_CLOEXEC as flags to any eventfd's created
> internally.
[LCM] Agree, make sense.

Reply via email to