The rte_mov256 function was missing for AVX2.
Does nobody build test for AVX2 and check the compiler output?
Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com>
---
lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h b/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h
index b678b5c942..d4d7a5cfc8 100644
--- a/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h
+++ b/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h
@@ -371,6 +371,23 @@ rte_mov128(uint8_t *dst, const uint8_t *src)
rte_mov32((uint8_t *)dst + 3 * 32, (const uint8_t *)src + 3 * 32);
}
+/**
+ * Copy 256 bytes from one location to another,
+ * locations should not overlap.
+ */
+static __rte_always_inline void
+rte_mov256(uint8_t *dst, const uint8_t *src)
+{
+ rte_mov32((uint8_t *)dst + 0 * 32, (const uint8_t *)src + 0 * 32);
+ rte_mov32((uint8_t *)dst + 1 * 32, (const uint8_t *)src + 1 * 32);
+ rte_mov32((uint8_t *)dst + 2 * 32, (const uint8_t *)src + 2 * 32);
+ rte_mov32((uint8_t *)dst + 3 * 32, (const uint8_t *)src + 3 * 32);
+ rte_mov32((uint8_t *)dst + 4 * 32, (const uint8_t *)src + 4 * 32);
+ rte_mov32((uint8_t *)dst + 5 * 32, (const uint8_t *)src + 5 * 32);
+ rte_mov32((uint8_t *)dst + 6 * 32, (const uint8_t *)src + 6 * 32);
+ rte_mov32((uint8_t *)dst + 7 * 32, (const uint8_t *)src + 7 * 32);
+}
+
/**
* Copy 128-byte blocks from one location to another,
* locations should not overlap.
--
2.17.1
