> diff --git a/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.h b/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.h
> index ed528b8..b7ecf94 100644
> --- a/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.h
> +++ b/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.h
> @@ -224,6 +224,19 @@ struct rte_bbdev_queue_conf {
> rte_bbdev_queue_stop(uint16_t dev_id, uint16_t queue_id);
>
> /**
> + * Flags indicate the reason why a previous enqueue may not have
> + * consumed all requested operations
> + * In case of multiple reasons the latter superdes a previous one
Spell check - supersedes.
> + */
> +enum rte_bbdev_enqueue_status {
> + RTE_BBDEV_ENQ_STATUS_NONE, /**< Nothing to report */
> + RTE_BBDEV_ENQ_STATUS_QUEUE_FULL, /**< Not enough room in
> queue */
> + RTE_BBDEV_ENQ_STATUS_RING_FULL, /**< Not enough room in
> ring */
> + RTE_BBDEV_ENQ_STATUS_INVALID_OP, /**< Operation was
> rejected as invalid */
> + RTE_BBDEV_ENQ_STATUS_PADDED_MAX = 6, /**< Maximum enq
> status number including padding */
Are we ok to have this kind of padding across DPDK for all the enums to avoid
ABI issues?
@Ray, @Thomas: any thoughts?
