On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 08:36:05AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:20:40 +0200 > David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 9:54 AM Markus Theil <markus.th...@tu-ilmenau.de> > > wrote: > > > > > > From: Michael Pfeiffer <michael.pfeif...@tu-ilmenau.de> > > > > > > Also expose the pthread id of each lcore, in > > > order to allow modification of pthread attributes, > > > for example use rte_thread_setname without executing > > > pthread_self() on the maybe already running lcore. > > > > > > The rte_lcore_to_thread_id function is added to API. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Pfeiffer <michael.pfeif...@tu-ilmenau.de> > > > > We are trying to abstract the use of pthread in DPDK API. > > So I don't think this patch is going in the right direction. > > Agree, exposing this will make Windows support harder > and who knows what next OS to come will need.
+1 please don't expose platform details through eal you destroy portability. i'll take a closer look at this mail next week to see if i have anything to offer.
