It looks good.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chengwen Feng <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 18:53
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Xu, Rosen
> <[email protected]>; Zhang, Tianfei <[email protected]>; Huang,
> Wei <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] raw/ifpga/base: fix mmap retcode check fail
>
> The MAP_FAILED should be used to determine whether the mapping is
> successful.
>
> Fixes: e41856b515ce ("raw/ifpga/base: enhance driver reliability in multi-
> process")
> Cc: [email protected]
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/raw/ifpga/base/opae_hw_api.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/raw/ifpga/base/opae_hw_api.c
> b/drivers/raw/ifpga/base/opae_hw_api.c
> index 1117c3e160..6d48d227d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/raw/ifpga/base/opae_hw_api.c
> +++ b/drivers/raw/ifpga/base/opae_hw_api.c
> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static pthread_mutex_t
> *opae_adapter_mutex_open(struct opae_adapter *adapter)
> PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED,
> shm_id, 0);
> adapter->lock = (pthread_mutex_t *)ptr;
> - if (ptr) {
> + if (ptr != MAP_FAILED) {
> dev_info(NULL,
> "shared memory %s address is %p\n",
> shm_name, ptr);
> @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static void *opae_adapter_shm_alloc(struct
> opae_adapter *adapter)
> adapter->shm.size = size;
> adapter->shm.ptr = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ |
> PROT_WRITE,
> MAP_SHARED,
> shm_id, 0);
> - if (adapter->shm.ptr) {
> + if (adapter->shm.ptr != MAP_FAILED) {
> dev_info(NULL,
> "shared memory %s address is %p\n",
> shm_name, adapter->shm.ptr);
> --
> 2.17.1
