On 2023/04/20 16:20, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 8:42 PM
To: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>; Bruce Richardson
<bruce.richard...@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] config/arm: Enable NUMA for generic Arm build
We enable NUMA even if the presence of NUMA is unknown for the other
architectures. Enable
NUMA for generic Arm build too.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com>
---
config/arm/meson.build | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config/arm/meson.build b/config/arm/meson.build index
724c00ad7e..f8ee7cdafb
100644
--- a/config/arm/meson.build
+++ b/config/arm/meson.build
@@ -271,13 +271,15 @@ implementers = {
soc_generic = {
'description': 'Generic un-optimized build for armv8 aarch64 exec mode',
'implementer': 'generic',
- 'part_number': 'generic'
+ 'part_number': 'generic',
+ 'numa': true
The default value of numa is true. So no need to add it here?
if not soc_config.get('numa', true)
has_libnuma = 0
endif
You're right. I confirmed this change is unnecessary. Please ignore this
patch and consider merging only the first patch of this series.
}
soc_generic_aarch32 = {
'description': 'Generic un-optimized build for armv8 aarch32 exec mode',
'implementer': 'generic',
- 'part_number': 'generic_aarch32'
+ 'part_number': 'generic_aarch32',
+ 'numa': true
}
soc_armada = {
--
2.40.0