Hi Vipin,

On 1/13/2023 1:14 PM, Vipin P R wrote:
Ignore mask ignores essential bits WHICH could have been contiguous.
This commit aims to rectify that

Suggested rewording:

fbarray: fix incorrect lookahead ignore mask

Currently, when lookahead reaches a point where we've lost the run, we set ignore mask to ignore N bits we were looking for for lookahead. The problem is, because we're only looking at first bit after collapsing next N bits into it, we end up ignoring bits that could've potentially started a new run not from the first bit.

To reproduce this issue, we need to do the following:

1) Look for N bits where 64 > N > 1 (to enable lookahead behavior)
2) Set last bit of mask M (to trigger lookahead)
3) Leave first bit of mask M+1 unset (to create incorrect ignore mask)
4) Have next N bits of mask M+1 set

For example:

1) Look for 3 bits
2) Set bit 63 (last bit of first mask)
3) Leave bit 64 unset (first bit of second mask)
4) Set bits 65-67

With current code, we will not find a run starting from bit 65, because we set ignore mask to ignore first 3 bits of second mask.

Fix this behavior by only setting the ignore mask when we know there were no bits in the mask at all, so there's no chance in skipping bits that could've been useful to us.

Fixes: c44d09811b40 ("eal: add shared indexed file-backed array")


Cc: sta...@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Vipin P R <vip...@vmware.com>
Acked-by: Kumara Parameshwaran <kparamesh...@vmware.com>
---
Depends-on: 0001-Memory-Allocation-Fixes-ms_idx-jump-lookahead-during.patch
Depends-on: 0002-Memory-Allocation-Fixes-ms_idx-jump-lookbehind-durin.patch
---
  lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c | 7 ++++++-
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c 
b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c
index 90240e8..313681a 100644
--- a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c
+++ b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c
@@ -235,7 +235,12 @@ find_next_n(const struct rte_fbarray *arr, unsigned int 
start, unsigned int n,
                                 * no runs in the space we've lookahead-scanned
                                 * as well, so skip that on next iteration.
                                 */
-                               ignore_msk = ~((1ULL << need) - 1);
+                               if (!lookahead_msk) {
+                                       /* There aren't "need" number of 
contiguous bits anywhere in the mask.
+                                        * Ignore these many number of bits 
from LSB for the next iteration.
+                                        */
+                                       ignore_msk = ~((1ULL << need) - 1);
+                               }

Great find! Needs a unit test though. I've described in the commit message how to reproduce this behavior, should be trivial to implement it as a unit test.

With above changes,

Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>

--
Thanks,
Anatoly

Reply via email to