Hi John, Please see inline.
Thanks, Anoob > -----Original Message----- > From: John McNamara <john.mcnam...@intel.com> > Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 5:35 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: tho...@monjalon.net; John McNamara <john.mcnam...@intel.com> > Subject: [EXT] [PATCH v1] doc: update release notes for 23.11 > > External Email > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Fix grammar, spelling and formatting of DPDK 23.11 release notes. > > Signed-off-by: John McNamara <john.mcnam...@intel.com> > --- > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_11.rst | 30 ++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_11.rst > b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_11.rst > index e16bc20466..f979c8f21a 100644 > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_11.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_11.rst <snip> > @@ -212,12 +214,12 @@ New Features > Added Rx inject API to allow applications to submit packets > for protocol offload and have them injected back to ethdev Rx > so that further ethdev Rx actions (IP reassembly, packet parsing and flow > lookups) > - can happen based on inner packet. > + can happen based on the inner packet. > > - The API when implemented by an ethdev, application would be able to process > + When using the API when implemented by an ethdev the application > + would be able to process > packets that are received without/failed inline offload processing > (such as fragmented ESP packets with inline IPsec offload). > - The API when implemented by a cryptodev, can be used for injecting packets > + When using the AP when implemented by a cryptodev it can be used for [Anoob] The above should be API instead of AP. Can you correct the same? <snip>
