On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> wrote:
> 2015-10-21 16:57, Alejandro Lucero: > > I understand interest for not having another UIO driver does exist. We > > could maintain an external nfp_uio by now till either we get rid of it or > > we definitely find out it is really needed. any chance to accept nfp_uio > by > > now? > > No, there are some work currently to get rid of igb_uio. > So there are little chances to accept nfp_uio one day. > Please take the first step of integrating your PMD without link interrupt. > Later we'll be able to discuss how to mitigate the interrupt issue. > Ok. I will create a new patchset version without nfp_uio. By the way, that work with igb_uio is about the patches to pci_uio_generic? I thought there was some reticence from the maintainer for adding pci bus master there.