On 2024-10-09 22:46, Morten Brørup wrote:
From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:mattias.ronnb...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 18 September 2024 10.26

A few corrections to a comment. Besides that,

Acked-by: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com>


+/*
+ * The potential performance benefit of lcore variables compared to
+ * the use of statically sized, lcore id-indexed arrays are not

are not -> is not

+ * shorter latencies in a scenario with low cache pressure, but rather
+ * fewer cache misses in a real-world scenario, with extensive cache
+ * usage. These tests are a crude simulation of such, using <N> dummy
+ * modules, each wiht a small, per-lcore state. Note however that

wiht -> with

+ * these tests has very little non-lcore/thread local state, which is

has -> have

+ * unrealistic.
+ */


All fixed. Thanks.


Reply via email to