On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 06:51:55AM -0700, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 08:52:12AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 4:27 PM Bruce Richardson
> > <bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:54:40PM +0000, Praveen Shetty wrote:
> > > > Truncation of constant value compiler warning was reported in clang/msvc
> > > > compiler for the VIRTCHNL2_CAP_OEM bit setting.This is due to 64 bit 
> > > > number
> > > > is initialized in a 32 bit enum.VIRTCHNL2_CAP_OEM capability is not 
> > > > used in
> > > > the present dpdk code,so removing this bit setting from the dpdk to 
> > > > avoid
> > > > the truncation.
> > >
> > > Please just watch spacing after punctuation in commit message. Will fix on
> > > apply as necessary, no need for new revision to fix it.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Praveen Shetty <praveen.she...@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/net/intel/idpf/base/virtchnl2.h | 2 --
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/base/virtchnl2.h 
> > > > b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/base/virtchnl2.h
> > > > index 3285a2b674..cf010c0504 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/intel/idpf/base/virtchnl2.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/intel/idpf/base/virtchnl2.h
> > > > @@ -265,8 +265,6 @@ enum virtchnl2_cap_other {
> > > >        * if a reserved bit is set in a standard completion's tag.
> > > >        */
> > > >       VIRTCHNL2_CAP_MISS_COMPL_TAG            = BIT_ULL(20),
> > > > -     /* This must be the last capability */
> > > > -     VIRTCHNL2_CAP_OEM                       = BIT_ULL(63),
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > >
> > > Although technically perhaps not as good as [1], this avoids significant
> > > divergence from the shared base code, while still fixing the core issue.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] 
> > > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1734537913-1159-1-git-send-email-andre...@linux.microsoft.com/
> > 
> > LGTM.
> > I marked Andre patch as rejected.
> > 
> 
> I'm good with that. My main goal is to get this code to compile with MSVC.
> 
Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.

thanks,
/Bruce

Reply via email to