Hi Robert,

Sorry for my delay, I am traveling this week, I will reply as soon as I find a 
slot to focus on this, hopefully in the next couple of days, thanks for your 
patience.

Regards,
Cristian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanford, Robert [mailto:rsanford at akamai.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 1, 2016 12:43 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org; Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] app/test: enhance
> test_port_ring_writer
> 
> We don't need to change this line, because we never access more than
> RTE_PORT_IN_BURST_SIZE_MAX (64) elements in this array:
> 
> -     struct rte_mbuf *mbuf[RTE_PORT_IN_BURST_SIZE_MAX];
> +     struct rte_mbuf *mbuf[2 * RTE_PORT_IN_BURST_SIZE_MAX];
> 
> 
> --
> Robert
> 
> >Add code to send two 60-packet bursts to a ring port_out.
> >This tests a ring writer buffer overflow problem and fix
> >(in patch 2/4).
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Robert Sanford <rsanford at akamai.com>
> >---
> > app/test/test_table_ports.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/app/test/test_table_ports.c b/app/test/test_table_ports.c
> >index 2532367..0c0ec0a 100644
> >--- a/app/test/test_table_ports.c
> >+++ b/app/test/test_table_ports.c
> >@@ -149,8 +149,8 @@ test_port_ring_writer(void)
> >
> >     /* -- Traffic TX -- */
> >     int expected_pkts, received_pkts;
> >-    struct rte_mbuf *mbuf[RTE_PORT_IN_BURST_SIZE_MAX];
> >-    struct rte_mbuf *res_mbuf[RTE_PORT_IN_BURST_SIZE_MAX];
> >+    struct rte_mbuf *mbuf[2 * RTE_PORT_IN_BURST_SIZE_MAX];
> >+    struct rte_mbuf *res_mbuf[2 * RTE_PORT_IN_BURST_SIZE_MAX];
> >
> >     port_ring_writer_params.ring = RING_TX;
> >     port_ring_writer_params.tx_burst_sz =
> RTE_PORT_IN_BURST_SIZE_MAX;
> >@@ -216,5 +216,28 @@ test_port_ring_writer(void)
> >     for (i = 0; i < RTE_PORT_IN_BURST_SIZE_MAX; i++)
> >             rte_pktmbuf_free(res_mbuf[i]);
> >
> >+    /* TX Bulk - send two 60-packet bursts */
> >+    uint64_t pkt_mask = 0xfffffffffffffff0ULL;
> >+
> >+    for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> >+            mbuf[i] = NULL;
> >+    for (i = 4; i < 64; i++)
> >+            mbuf[i] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(pool);
> >+    rte_port_ring_writer_ops.f_tx_bulk(port, mbuf, pkt_mask);
> >+    for (i = 4; i < 64; i++)
> >+            mbuf[i] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(pool);
> >+    rte_port_ring_writer_ops.f_tx_bulk(port, mbuf, pkt_mask);
> >+    rte_port_ring_writer_ops.f_flush(port);
> >+
> >+    expected_pkts = 2 * 60;
> >+    received_pkts =
> rte_ring_sc_dequeue_burst(port_ring_writer_params.ring,
> >+            (void **)res_mbuf, 2 * RTE_PORT_IN_BURST_SIZE_MAX);
> >+
> >+    if (received_pkts != expected_pkts)
> >+            return -10;
> >+
> >+    for (i = 0; i < received_pkts; i++)
> >+            rte_pktmbuf_free(res_mbuf[i]);
> >+
> >     return 0;
> > }
> >--
> >1.7.1
> 
> 

Reply via email to