Hi,

On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 05:21:57PM -0700, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> When compiling with MSVC the error below is hit:
> 
> drivers\net\mlx5\mlx5_tx.h(1148): error C2065: 'rte_v128u32_t':
>     undeclared identifier
> 
> Turns out that with MSVC the data type rte_v128u32_t is not used, but
> its size needs to be known. This patch defines a macro to store that
> size and replaces instances of sizeof(rte_v128u32_t) with that macro.
> 
> A static assert is added to ensure the new macro never diverges from
> sizeof(rte_v128u32_t).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andre...@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_defs.h |  2 ++
>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c | 11 ++++++++---
>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_tx.h   |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_defs.h b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_defs.h
> index 9c454983be..c5e2c59309 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_defs.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_defs.h
> @@ -196,4 +196,6 @@
>  
>  #define MLX5_CNT_SVC_CYCLE_TIME_DEFAULT 500
>  
> +#define MLX5_SIZEOF_V128U32_T 16
> +
>  #endif /* RTE_PMD_MLX5_DEFS_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c
> index 9c075f6a56..3f4942e225 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c
> @@ -28,11 +28,16 @@
>  #include "mlx5_tx.h"
>  
>  /* static asserts */
> +#ifndef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
> +static_assert(sizeof(rte_v128u32_t) == MLX5_SIZEOF_V128U32_T,
> +             "MLX5_SIZEOF_V128U32_T must hold sizeof(rte_v128u32_t)");
> +#endif

Thank you for the patch.
This proposal is ok, but I think it can be slightly improved.

The reference to rte_v128u32_t (in code and in names) can be removed, because
the code which relies on MLX5_ESEG_MIN_INLINE_SIZE does not really use
rte_v128u32_t type. The relevant code e.g., in mlx5_tx_eseg_dmin(),
always copies first 2 bytes of the packet (through uint16_t pointer,
these would be first 2 bytes of destination MAC address)
and then does one of the two:

1. Copies following 16 bytes using rte_mov16().
   (Corresponds to first static_assert for MLX5_ESEG_MIN_INLINE_SIZE).
2. If there is a VLAN defined in mbuf, then:
   - the rest of destination MAC address is copied,
   - source MAC address is copied,
   - VLAN is inserted,
   - 2 bytes appearing after VLAN header are copied.
   (Corresponds to 2nd static_assert for MLX5_ESEG_MIN_INLINE_SIZE).

Amount of data copied is inferred from HW arch and packet descriptor
layout, not rte_v128u32_t.

Since rte_mov16() is used in real code and rte_v128u32_t is only used to
carry over the length of the copy, I would propose to:

- Replace instances of sizeof(rte_v128u32_t) with a macro named MLX5_SIZE_MOV16
  to better reflect the real usage in mlx5 PMD.
- Remove static_assert for
  "sizeof(rte_v128u32_t) == MLX5_SIZEOF_V128U32_T".

Would you be able to apply these changes?

> +
>  static_assert(MLX5_CQE_STATUS_HW_OWN < 0, "Must be negative value");
>  static_assert(MLX5_CQE_STATUS_SW_OWN < 0, "Must be negative value");
>  static_assert(MLX5_ESEG_MIN_INLINE_SIZE ==
>               (sizeof(uint16_t) +
> -              sizeof(rte_v128u32_t)),
> +             MLX5_SIZEOF_V128U32_T),
>               "invalid Ethernet Segment data size");
>  static_assert(MLX5_ESEG_MIN_INLINE_SIZE ==
>               (sizeof(uint16_t) +
> @@ -41,7 +46,7 @@ static_assert(MLX5_ESEG_MIN_INLINE_SIZE ==
>               "invalid Ethernet Segment data size");
>  static_assert(MLX5_ESEG_MIN_INLINE_SIZE ==
>               (sizeof(uint16_t) +
> -              sizeof(rte_v128u32_t)),
> +             MLX5_SIZEOF_V128U32_T),
>               "invalid Ethernet Segment data size");
>  static_assert(MLX5_ESEG_MIN_INLINE_SIZE ==
>               (sizeof(uint16_t) +
> @@ -50,7 +55,7 @@ static_assert(MLX5_ESEG_MIN_INLINE_SIZE ==
>               "invalid Ethernet Segment data size");
>  static_assert(MLX5_ESEG_MIN_INLINE_SIZE ==
>               (sizeof(uint16_t) +
> -              sizeof(rte_v128u32_t)),
> +             MLX5_SIZEOF_V128U32_T),
>               "invalid Ethernet Segment data size");
>  static_assert(MLX5_ESEG_MIN_INLINE_SIZE ==
>               (sizeof(uint16_t) +
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_tx.h b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_tx.h
> index 55568c41b1..5647f6a37d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_tx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_tx.h
> @@ -1145,7 +1145,7 @@ mlx5_tx_eseg_data(struct mlx5_txq_data *__rte_restrict 
> txq,
>       } else {
>               /* Fill the gap in the title WQEBB with inline data. */
>               rte_mov16(pdst, psrc);
> -             psrc += sizeof(rte_v128u32_t);
> +             psrc += MLX5_SIZEOF_V128U32_T;
>       }
>       pdst = (uint8_t *)(es + 2);
>       MLX5_ASSERT(inlen >= MLX5_ESEG_MIN_INLINE_SIZE);
> -- 
> 2.49.0.vfs.0.3
> 

Best regards,
Dariusz Sosnowski

Reply via email to