20/06/2025 15:37, Bruce Richardson: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 02:30:23PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote: > > This issue was reported by static analysis. It is a false positive, > > because both `rte_socket_count` and `rte_socket_id_by_idx` only report > > information about physical sockets, and these specific calls are made > > during EAL initialization, so no other sockets (i.e. external) could have > > been available, so it is pretty much impossible to get invalid return here. > > > > Still, to avoid future false positives, we can fix it here. > > > > Coverity issue: 470131 > > > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks?
