Acked-by: Chengwen Feng <fengcheng...@huawei.com>
On 7/23/2025 9:31 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> Caught by UBSan:
>
> ../lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h:206:21: runtime error:
> member access within misaligned address 0x7ffd9c67f228 for
> type 'const rte_int128_t', which requires 16 byte alignment
> 0x7ffd9c67f228: note: pointer points here
> 00 00 00 00 c0 5d 3e 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> ^
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior
> ../lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h:206:21 in
> ../lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h:206:21: runtime error:
> member access within misaligned address 0x7ffd9c67f228 for type
> 'const union rte_int128_t::(anonymous at
> ../lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h:1102:2)', which requires
> 16 byte alignment
> 0x7ffd9c67f228: note: pointer points here
> 00 00 00 00 c0 5d 3e 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> ^
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior
> ../lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h:206:21 in
> ../lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h:206:16: runtime error:
> load of misaligned address 0x7ffd9c67f228 for type
> 'const uint64_t' (aka 'const unsigned long'), which requires
> 16 byte alignment
> 0x7ffd9c67f228: note: pointer points here
> 00 00 00 00 c0 5d 3e 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> ^
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior
> ../lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h:206:21 in
>
> Rather than explicitly set alignment in callers, mark the structure
> itself with an alignment constraint.
>
> Fixes: 3340202f5954 ("stack: add lock-free implementation")
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@huawei.com>
