> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2025 7:49 PM > To: Christophe Fontaine <[email protected]> > Cc: Jerin Jacob <[email protected]>; Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda > <[email protected]>; Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram > <[email protected]>; Zhirun Yan <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; Guvenc Gulce <[email protected]> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH 0/2] graph: dispatch mode improvements > > 23/07/2025 18: 49, Christophe Fontaine: > Small series to improve dispatch > mode for lib/graph. > In order to run an instance of the graph in a control > thread (slow path > defined as nodes) in addition to the datapath thread, we > need: ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart Prioritize security for external emails: > Confirm sender and content safety before clicking links or opening attachments > <https://us-phishalarm- > ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/CRVmXkqW!s03Z1P80YjX6F8USVpU1pEPnEL9aBV > CDmZhTUwMWrUFrDQFePMFjzqQsmmFOvE8V7-Hk$> > Report Suspicious > > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd > 23/07/2025 18:49, Christophe Fontaine: > > Small series to improve dispatch mode for lib/graph. > > In order to run an instance of the graph in a control thread (slow > > path defined as nodes) in addition to the datapath thread, we need: > > - the ability to run graph_walk on an non-eal thread > > - a signaling mechanism to wake up the control thread > > Should I expect a review before merging? Someone?
@Zhirun Yan The changes are for mcore dispatch, please review. In general, changes looks good to me. >
