OK, I suppose that presenting in a DPDK Summit would fit very well. Thank you
27/10/2025 16:31, Adel Belkhiri: > Hello Thomas, > Thank you very much for your comment. What I meant by bare metal was actually > on top of the OS, so you are absolutely right that the phrasing was > confusing. I’ve reworded the question according to your suggestion. > Regarding the results, I’m currently preparing an academic paper to submit > either to the International Conference on Performance Engineering (ICPE) or > the Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS). I also plan to share > the results at the next DPDK Summit. > If you think it would be interesting to share the findings here in the group, > I’d be happy to do so―or I can send you a copy of the paper once it’s > completed. > Cheers, > Adel > > ________________________________ > From: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2025 10:06 AM > To: Adel Belkhiri <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: DPDK observability survey (≈7 min) > > Hello Adel, > > 21/10/2025 16:18, Adel Belkhiri: > > Quick reminder about our ≈7-minute survey > > on how you debug and observe DPDK-based applications in real environments. > > > > Survey: https://forms.office.com/r/6zRAqxWYKj > > In the question "Runtime environment", > I suppose "Bare Metal" means just on top of the OS? > DPDK used to be a real bare metal environment, > so I suggest rewording this question. > > > > This will help guide open-source observability work (Trace Compass analyses) > > by Polytechnique Montréal, Ericsson Canada, and Ciena. > > Will you share the results here? > > Thank you
