Hi Yuanhan,
On 4/28/2016 6:37 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:32:12PM +0000, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> Issue: When virtio was proposed in DPDK, there is no API to free memzones.
>> But this has changed since rte_memzone_free() has been implemented by
>> commit ff909fe21f.
> The more proper way to reference a commit is
>
> commit_id ("$commit_subject")
>
> Like what the fixline does.
OK.
>
>> This patch is to make sure memzones in struct virtqueue, like mz and
>> virtio_net_hdr_mz, are freed when queue is released or setup fails.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c | 69
>> ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 4 +--
>> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>> index 63a368a..54eacf6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>> @@ -261,12 +261,18 @@ virtio_set_multiple_queues(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>> uint16_t nb_queues)
>> }
>>
>> void
>> -virtio_dev_queue_release(struct virtqueue *vq) {
>> +virtio_dev_queue_release(struct virtqueue *vq, int io_related)
>> +{
>> struct virtio_hw *hw;
>>
>> if (vq) {
>> hw = vq->hw;
>> - hw->vtpci_ops->del_queue(hw, vq);
>> + if (io_related)
>> + hw->vtpci_ops->del_queue(hw, vq);
> What is "io_related" supposed to mean here, queue has been started/set
> up? If so, "started" might be better. And remember to put it into the vq
> struct: we don't need an extra parameter for that.
Good suggestion.
>
>> +
>> + rte_memzone_free(vq->mz);
>> + if (vq->virtio_net_hdr_mz)
>> + rte_memzone_free(vq->virtio_net_hdr_mz);
>>
>> rte_free(vq->sw_ring);
>> rte_free(vq);
>> @@ -286,6 +292,7 @@ int virtio_dev_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>> unsigned int vq_size, size;
>> struct virtio_hw *hw = dev->data->dev_private;
>> struct virtqueue *vq = NULL;
>> + const char *queue_names[] = {"rvq", "txq", "cvq"};
>>
>> PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "setting up queue: %u", vtpci_queue_idx);
>>
>> @@ -305,34 +312,34 @@ int virtio_dev_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - if (queue_type == VTNET_RQ) {
>> - snprintf(vq_name, sizeof(vq_name), "port%d_rvq%d",
>> - dev->data->port_id, queue_idx);
>> - vq = rte_zmalloc(vq_name, sizeof(struct virtqueue) +
>> - vq_size * sizeof(struct vq_desc_extra),
>> RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
>> - vq->sw_ring = rte_zmalloc_socket("rxq->sw_ring",
>> - (RTE_PMD_VIRTIO_RX_MAX_BURST + vq_size) *
>> - sizeof(vq->sw_ring[0]), RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, socket_id);
>> - } else if (queue_type == VTNET_TQ) {
>> - snprintf(vq_name, sizeof(vq_name), "port%d_tvq%d",
>> - dev->data->port_id, queue_idx);
>> - vq = rte_zmalloc(vq_name, sizeof(struct virtqueue) +
>> - vq_size * sizeof(struct vq_desc_extra),
>> RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
>> - } else if (queue_type == VTNET_CQ) {
>> - snprintf(vq_name, sizeof(vq_name), "port%d_cvq",
>> - dev->data->port_id);
>> - vq = rte_zmalloc(vq_name, sizeof(struct virtqueue) +
>> - vq_size * sizeof(struct vq_desc_extra),
>> - RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
>> + if (queue_type < VTNET_RQ || queue_type > VTNET_RQ) {
>> + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "invalid queue type: %d", queue_type);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> +
>> + snprintf(vq_name, sizeof(vq_name), "port%d_%s%d",
>> + dev->data->port_id, queue_names[queue_type], queue_idx);
>> + vq = rte_zmalloc(vq_name, sizeof(struct virtqueue) +
>> + vq_size * sizeof(struct vq_desc_extra),
>> + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
> This is a cleanup, a good cleanup. So, make a patch for that, and do
> NOT mix cleanup and fix in one single patch, which is something I
> have told you quite few times, right?
You mean submit a specific patch for cleanup or just another commit
inside this patch set?
Thanks,
Jianfeng
>
>
> --yliu
