When running hash tests there are lots of warnings about unsupported CRC32 algorithm requested. This because on x86 it is requesting ARM algorithm and vice/versa. The fallback is already tested elsewhere, so can be skipped.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]> --- app/test/test_hash.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_hash.c b/app/test/test_hash.c index 5791fd7f4c..35684b3849 100644 --- a/app/test/test_hash.c +++ b/app/test/test_hash.c @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ static struct rte_hash_parameters ut_params = { static int test_crc32_hash_alg_equiv(void) { +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64) || defined(RTE_ARCH_X86) uint32_t hash_val; uint32_t init_val; uint64_t data64[CRC32_DWORDS]; @@ -211,6 +212,7 @@ test_crc32_hash_alg_equiv(void) rte_hash_crc_set_alg(CRC32_SW); hash_val = rte_hash_crc(data64, data_len, init_val); +#ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86 /* Check against 4-byte-operand sse4.2 CRC32 if available */ rte_hash_crc_set_alg(CRC32_SSE42); if (hash_val != rte_hash_crc(data64, data_len, init_val)) { @@ -224,13 +226,14 @@ test_crc32_hash_alg_equiv(void) printf("Failed checking CRC32_SW against CRC32_SSE42_x64\n"); break; } - +#elif defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64) /* Check against 8-byte-operand ARM64 CRC32 if available */ rte_hash_crc_set_alg(CRC32_ARM64); if (hash_val != rte_hash_crc(data64, data_len, init_val)) { printf("Failed checking CRC32_SW against CRC32_ARM64\n"); break; } +#endif } /* Resetting to best available algorithm */ @@ -245,6 +248,10 @@ test_crc32_hash_alg_equiv(void) ((j+1) % 16 == 0 || j == data_len - 1) ? '\n' : ' '); return -1; +#else + /* No alternate algorithms on this platform */ + return 0; +#endif } /* -- 2.51.0
