On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 01:48:22PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Mandal, Anurag [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, 5 January 2026 12.31
> > 
> > > VRRP advertisement packets are dropped as TX-errors upon transmission
> > > from a vsi of ice PF due to MAC anti-spoof check, which is enabled by
> > default.
> > > There is no way to disable this security check in the Tx direction to
> > avoid these
> > > packets being dropped.
> > >
> > > This patch introduces devargs "mac-anti-spoof" to allow user to
> > disable MAC
> > > anti-spoof check. Disable MAC Anti-spoof check in the Tx direction to
> > send
> > > outgoing packets even when their destination MAC address matches one
> > of
> > > the MAC addresses assigned to that same NIC port and avoid getting
> > dropped
> > > as TX-errors.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anurag Mandal <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > V5: Addressed CI failures
> > >  - Removed ICE_AQ_VSI_SEC_FLAG_ENA_MAC_ANTI_SPOOF
> > >    flag as that is causing CI failures and observed
> > >    MAC Anti-spoof check is enabled by default
> > >    irrespective of that flag.
> > > V4: Addressed ASan CI failures & Morten Brørup's feedback
> > >  - set the default value of the devargs to 1
> > >  - enabled MAC anti-spoof check by default
> > >  - provided devargs option to disbale the same
> > >
> > > V3: Addressed Morten Brørup's feedback
> > >  - set the default value of the devargs to 0
> > >  - disabled MAC anti-spoof check by default
> > >  - provided devargs option to enable the same
> > >  - synchronized with source prune
> > >
> > > V2: Addressed Bruce Richardson's feedback
> > >  - changed devargs name to "mac-anti-spoof"
> > >  - changed devargs member name to "mac_anti_spoof"
> > >  - changed macro name to "ICE_MAC_ANTI_SPOOF_ARG"
> > >  - set the default value of the devargs to 1
> > >  - added NOTICE log msg when MAC Anti-spoof is disabled
> > >  - added more code comments to provide clarity
> > >  - fixed typo error with ICE_AQ_VSI_SEC_FLAG_ENA_MAC_ANTI_SPOOF
> > >
> > >  doc/guides/nics/ice.rst            | 12 ++++++++
> > >  drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_ethdev.c | 44
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_ethdev.h |  1 +
> > >  3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst b/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst index
> > > 6cc27cefa7..c3e9cfaee3 100644
> > > --- a/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst
> > > +++ b/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst
> > > @@ -194,6 +194,18 @@ Runtime Configuration
> > >
> > >      -a 80:00.0,source-prune=1
> > >
> > > +- ``MAC Anti-spoof Disable`` (default ``1``)
> 
> Suggest removing "Disable" from this headline, to clarify that the default 1 
> value enables MAC Anti-spoof (does not activate "MAC Anti-spoof Disable").
> 
> > > +
> > > +  Disable MAC Anti-spoof check in the Tx direction to send outgoing
> > > + packets when their destination MAC address matches one of the  MAC
> > > + addresses assigned to that same NIC port.By default, these
> > outgoing
> > > + packets are dropped due to MAC Anti-spoof check.
> 
> The default 1 (instead of 0) is a temporary workaround due to CI issues.
> This (incorrect default value) should be registered as a bug in Bugzilla.
> 

I don't think it's just a CI issue. The CI is flagging a genuine issue
here. When I tested previous versions of this patch, the hardware was doing 
internal
looping of packets when running testpmd, such that sending in one packet
let to forwarding of millions of PPS.

> And a warning should be added to the description here 
> (/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst) that the default 1 is a known bug, and is expected 
> to be changed to 0 at a later time. This warning can refer to the bug in 
> Bugzilla.
> 

That may or may not be the case, depending on if its possible to get a
working, sane, default configuration with a default of 0, which still
allows e.g. macfwd or macswap configs of testpmd to work ok.

> > > +
> > > +  MAC Anti-spoof can be disabled by resetting the devargs parameter
> > > + ``mac-anti-spoof``,  for example::
> > > +
> > > +    -a 80:00.0,mac-anti-spoof=0
> > > +
> > >  - ``Protocol extraction for per queue``
> > >
> > >    Configure the RX queues to do protocol extraction into mbuf for
> > protocol
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> > > b/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> > > index c1d92435d1..7251b111e0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> > > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> > >  #define ICE_DDP_LOAD_SCHED_ARG    "ddp_load_sched_topo"
> > >  #define ICE_TM_LEVELS_ARG         "tm_sched_levels"
> > >  #define ICE_SOURCE_PRUNE_ARG      "source-prune"
> > > +#define ICE_MAC_ANTI_SPOOF_ARG    "mac-anti-spoof"
> > >  #define ICE_LINK_STATE_ON_CLOSE   "link_state_on_close"
> > >
> > >  #define ICE_CYCLECOUNTER_MASK  0xffffffffffffffffULL @@ -60,6 +61,7
> > @@
> > > static const char * const ice_valid_args[] = {
> > >   ICE_DDP_LOAD_SCHED_ARG,
> > >   ICE_TM_LEVELS_ARG,
> > >   ICE_SOURCE_PRUNE_ARG,
> > > + ICE_MAC_ANTI_SPOOF_ARG,
> > >   ICE_LINK_STATE_ON_CLOSE,
> > >   NULL
> > >  };
> > > @@ -1761,13 +1763,46 @@ ice_setup_vsi(struct ice_pf *pf, enum
> > > ice_vsi_type type)
> > >           /* Source Prune */
> > >           if (ad->devargs.source_prune != 1) {
> > >                   /* Disable source prune to support VRRP
> > > -                  * when source-prune devarg is not set
> > > +                  * when source-prune devargs is not set
> > >                    */
> > >                   vsi_ctx.info.sw_flags =
> > >                           ICE_AQ_VSI_SW_FLAG_LOCAL_LB;
> > >                   vsi_ctx.info.sw_flags |=
> > >                           ICE_AQ_VSI_SW_FLAG_SRC_PRUNE;
> > >           }
> > > +         /* MAC Anti-spoof */
> > > +         /* By default, Source Prune in Rx is disabled
> > > +          * and MAC Anti-spoof check in Tx is enabled.
> > > +          *
> > > +          * Source Prune is disabled by setting local
> > > +          * loopback with ICE_AQ_VSI_SW_FLAG_LOCAL_LB
> > > +          * flag in the Rx direction.
> > > +          * ICE_AQ_VSI_SW_FLAG_SRC_PRUNE is added to
> > > +          * prevent transmitted packets from being
> > > +          * looped back in some circumstances.
> > > +          *
> > > +          * MAC Anti-spoof check can be disabled by
> > > +          * clearing ICE_AQ_VSI_SW_FLAG_SRC_PRUNE
> > > +          * flag and setting Tx loopback with
> > > +          * ICE_AQ_VSI_SW_FLAG_ALLOW_LB flag in the
> > > +          * Tx direction.
> > > +          */
> > > +         if (ad->devargs.mac_anti_spoof == 0) {
> > > +                 /* Disable mac anti-spoof check in the
> > > +                  * Tx direction to avoid outgoing
> > > +                  * packets getting dropped as
> > > +                  * TX-errors for VRRP support when
> > > +                  * mac-anti-spoof devargs is not set
> > > +                  */
> > > +                 vsi_ctx.info.sw_flags &=
> > > +                         ~ICE_AQ_VSI_SW_FLAG_SRC_PRUNE;
> > > +                 PMD_INIT_LOG(NOTICE,
> > > +                              "Disabling MAC Anti-spoof check "
> > > +                              "in the Tx direction does not "
> > > +                              "affect Source Prune in the Rx
> > direction");
> 
> Try shortening the log message to fit on one line, so it is easier to "grep" 
> for.

Even without shortening, you can still put a whole string on a single line
without having to worry about the 100-character limit. Checkpatch ignores
strings extending beyond the limit. Better to have a long line than broken
strings.

> 
> > > +                 vsi_ctx.info.sw_flags |=
> > > +                         ICE_AQ_VSI_SW_FLAG_ALLOW_LB;
> > > +         }
> 
> If implicitly enabled, please PMD_INIT_LOG(WARNING, "MAC Anti-spoof check is 
> enabled"), as this kind of filtering is not the behavior expected by normal 
> applications.
> We can probably not distinguish between implicitly and explicitly enabled, so 
> simply log it if enabled.
> 
> > >           cfg = ICE_AQ_VSI_PROP_SW_VALID;
> > >           vsi_ctx.info.valid_sections |= rte_cpu_to_le_16(cfg);
> > >           vsi_ctx.info.sw_flags2 = ICE_AQ_VSI_SW_FLAG_LAN_ENA;
> > > @@ -2398,6 +2433,7 @@ static int ice_parse_devargs(struct rte_eth_dev
> > > *dev)
> > >           return -EINVAL;
> > >   }
> > >
> > > + ad->devargs.mac_anti_spoof = 1; /* enabled by default */
> > >   ad->devargs.proto_xtr_dflt = PROTO_XTR_NONE;
> > >   memset(ad->devargs.proto_xtr, PROTO_XTR_NONE,
> > >          sizeof(ad->devargs.proto_xtr)); @@ -2467,6 +2503,11 @@
> > static
> > > int ice_parse_devargs(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > >   if (ret)
> > >           goto bail;
> > >
> > > + ret = rte_kvargs_process(kvlist, ICE_MAC_ANTI_SPOOF_ARG,
> > > +                          &parse_bool, &ad-
> > > >devargs.mac_anti_spoof);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > +         goto bail;
> > > +
> > >   ret = rte_kvargs_process(kvlist, ICE_LINK_STATE_ON_CLOSE,
> > >                            &parse_link_state_on_close, &ad-
> > > >devargs.link_state_on_close);
> > >
> > > @@ -7732,6 +7773,7 @@ RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PARAM_STRING(net_ice,
> > >                         ICE_DDP_LOAD_SCHED_ARG "=<0|1>"
> > >                         ICE_TM_LEVELS_ARG "=<N>"
> > >                         ICE_SOURCE_PRUNE_ARG "=<0|1>"
> > > +                       ICE_MAC_ANTI_SPOOF_ARG "=<0|1>"
> > >                         ICE_RX_LOW_LATENCY_ARG "=<0|1>"
> > >                         ICE_LINK_STATE_ON_CLOSE
> > > "=<down|up|initial>");
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_ethdev.h
> > > b/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_ethdev.h
> > > index 72ed65f13b..5fe4688d57 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_ethdev.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_ethdev.h
> > > @@ -617,6 +617,7 @@ struct ice_devargs {
> > >   uint8_t ddp_load_sched;
> > >   uint8_t tm_exposed_levels;
> > >   uint8_t source_prune;
> > > + uint8_t mac_anti_spoof;
> > >   int link_state_on_close;
> > >   int xtr_field_offs;
> > >   uint8_t xtr_flag_offs[PROTO_XTR_MAX];
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > 
> > Hi Morten Brørup/Bruce,
> > 
> > Kindly review this patch. No CI errors reported.
> > 
> > Thank you.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Anurag M
> 

Reply via email to