> diff --git a/lib/hash/rte_hash_crc.h b/lib/hash/rte_hash_crc.h
> index fa07c97685..66f11fafcd 100644
> --- a/lib/hash/rte_hash_crc.h
> +++ b/lib/hash/rte_hash_crc.h
> @@ -127,6 +127,24 @@ rte_hash_crc(const void *data, uint32_t data_len, 
> uint32_t init_val)
>       unsigned i;
>       uintptr_t pd = (uintptr_t) data;
> 
> +     /* align input to 8 byte boundary if needed */
> +     if ((pd & 0x7) && data_len >= 8) {

Perhaps the case data_len < 8 should also be included, with each of the if's 
below checking and correcting data_len individually?

> +             uintptr_t unaligned_bytes = 8 - (pd & 0x7);
> +             data_len -= unaligned_bytes;
> +             if (unaligned_bytes & 0x4) {
> +                     init_val = rte_hash_crc_4byte(*(const uint32_t *)pd, 
> init_val);
> +                     pd += 4;
> +             }
> +             if (unaligned_bytes & 0x2) {
> +                     init_val = rte_hash_crc_2byte(*(const uint16_t *)pd, 
> init_val);
> +                     pd += 2;
> +             }
> +             if (unaligned_bytes & 0x1) {
> +                     init_val = rte_hash_crc_1byte(*(const uint8_t *)pd, 
> init_val);
> +                     pd += 1;
> +             }

Shouldn't the order be the opposite?

> +     }
> +
>       for (i = 0; i < data_len / 8; i++) {
>               init_val = rte_hash_crc_8byte(*(const uint64_t *)pd, init_val);
>               pd += 8;
> --
> 2.52.0

Reply via email to