On Thu, 25 Jun 2026 09:44:07 +0800
Jiawen Wu <[email protected]> wrote:

> > > +void txgbe_e56_rx_rd_second_code_40g(struct txgbe_hw *hw, int 
> > > *SECOND_CODE, int lane)
> > > +{
> > > + int i, median;
> > > + unsigned int rdata;
> > > + u32 addr;
> > > + int RXS_BBCDR_SECOND_ORDER_ST[RXS_READ_COUNT];
> > > +
> > > + /* Set ovrd_en=0 to read ASIC value */
> > > + addr = E56G__RXS0_ANA_OVRDEN_1_ADDR + (lane *  E56PHY_RXS_OFFSET);
> > > + rdata = rd32_ephy(hw, addr);
> > > + EPHY_XFLD(E56G__RXS0_ANA_OVRDEN_1, ovrd_en_ana_bbcdr_int_cstm_i) = 0;
> > > + wr32_ephy(hw, addr, rdata);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > +  * As status update from RXS hardware is asynchronous to read status of 
> > > SECOND_ORDER,
> > > +  * follow sequence mentioned below.
> > > +  */
> > > + for (i = 0; i < RXS_READ_COUNT; i = i + 1) {
> > > +         addr = E56G__RXS0_ANA_OVRDVAL_5_ADDR + (lane *  
> > > E56PHY_RXS_OFFSET);
> > > +         rdata = rd32_ephy(hw, addr);
> > > +         RXS_BBCDR_SECOND_ORDER_ST[i] = 
> > > EPHY_XFLD(E56G__RXS0_ANA_OVRDVAL_5,
> > > +                                                  ana_bbcdr_int_cstm_i);
> > > +         usec_delay(100);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* sort array RXS_BBCDR_SECOND_ORDER_ST[i] */
> > > + qsort(RXS_BBCDR_SECOND_ORDER_ST, RXS_READ_COUNT, sizeof(int), 
> > > txgbe_e56_int_cmp);
> > > +
> > > + median = ((RXS_READ_COUNT + 1) / 2) - 1;
> > > + *SECOND_CODE = RXS_BBCDR_SECOND_ORDER_ST[median];
> > > +
> > > + return;
> > > +}  
> > 
> > These extra returns are causing extra checkpatch warnings.
> > I know this is base code but if possible could you remove them.
> > 
> > 
> > WARNING:RETURN_VOID: void function return statements are not generally 
> > useful
> > #707: FILE: drivers/net/txgbe/base/txgbe_e56.c:1806:
> > +   return;
> > +}
> > 
> > WARNING:RETURN_VOID: void function return statements are not generally 
> > useful
> > #736: FILE: drivers/net/txgbe/base/txgbe_e56.c:1835:
> > +   return;
> > +}  
> 
> Alternatively, it can be declared as a static function. It is only invoked in 
> this .c file.
> 
> 

Checkpatch complains about the extra return (it is old BSD stylism).
Like I said, not a big deal; just showing it.

Reply via email to