On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 20:44:18 +0400 (+04) Ivan Malov <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I may, the premise that the netport branch never reads 'en_vport_id' does > not hold water, as 'efx_np_mac_stats' clearly accepts the vPort ID as its > third argument and correctly places it into > 'GET_NETPORT_STATISTICS_V2_IN_PORT_ID' unless the action is > 'EFX_STATS_DISABLE'. The comment is therefore accurate and will stay. As for > the "affects only Medford4" claim, that refers to observable counter > behaviour for the specific NIC family in question. > > Concerns expressed by the AI do not meet the threshold of an actual defect, > and thus no change to the patch is warranted. Agreed, I just do this to make sure everything gets looked at.
