Chengwen Feng <[email protected]> writes: > From: Chengwen Feng <[email protected]> > > The DPDK tree conflates CPU sockets with NUMA memory nodes: public > APIs, structure fields and macros are named after "socket" although > they actually identify a NUMA node (e.g. rte_socket_id(), the > socket_id field of rte_memzone, SOCKET_ID_ANY). This naming misleads > application developers and pollutes vendor code that targets NUMA > topologies. > > This series renames the terminology tree-wide:
Do not do this again. I have set the robot from considering patches from you for the next 227 hours. One for each hour that a patch-by-patch test would take. Do not repost this series again and expect the github robot to run for it. Please work with existing maintainers to come up with a plan for each area rename. CI resources are shared, and in the case of the github robot, they are shared among OVS, OVN, and DPDK. Additionally, a 227 patch series is completely unreviewable, and completely inconsiderate of reviewers time. Anything above 15 patches is, truly - who can keep that much details in mind.
