On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 01:35:46PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > Hello all, > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Thomas Monjalon > <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> wrote: > > 2016-07-11 13:33, Yuanhan Liu: > >> I'm not quite sure I understood it well: are you asking us to resend > >> what David has already send, say me for resending the virtio part? > >> > >> If so, what's the point of that? What's worse, it's likely to fail > >> apply (due to conflicts), as every one of us make a patch based on > >> the same base while touching some same files. > > > > Good point. > > There were some changes since the patches from David (and a new bnxt). > > That's why I was thinking to ask maintainers to take care of this change. > > But maybe it's better to do the change in one patchset. > > David, ok to refresh these patches? > > Now that we have a modinfo-like infra and the test code is exempt from > igb pci ids, all that remains (to fully get rid of this header) are > bypass api and kni/ethtool. > So the deal with Thomas is that I refresh those patches letting igb > and ixgbe pmd as is. > > Will send this later.
Thanks, and feel free to put my ack for the virtio part. Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com> Great work, BTW! --yliu