On 18/07/2016 15:07, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-07-18 15:54, Christian Ehrhardt: >> Hi Sergio, >> you might have seen that I had a similar version with awk in v2 IIRC. I >> also had the secondary tmp file just like you now. >> So, since it is so close to my old submission I wont object :-) >> >> Back then the discussion went for reduced build time dependencies and >> avoiding a second temp file, which was ok for me - so sed was chosen. > I don't see "awk" as a real dependency. I think it is as much common > as "sed". Isn't it?
I would agree. So v2 using temp var instead? Sergio
