> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 9:04 PM > To: Mrzyglod, DanielX T <danielx.t.mrzyglod at intel.com> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Singh, Jasvinder <jasvinder.singh at intel.com>; > Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/ip_pipeline: fix build error for gcc > 4.8 > > 2016-06-09 13:38, Daniel Mrzyglod: > > This patch fixes a maybe-uninitialized warning when compiling DPDK with > GCC 4.8 > > > > examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/pipeline_common_fe.c: In function > 'app_pipeline_track_pktq_out_to_link': > > examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/pipeline_common_fe.c:66:31: error: > > 'reader' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe- > uninitialized] > > > > struct app_pktq_out_params *pktq_out = > > > > Fixes: 760064838ec0 ("examples/ip_pipeline: link routing output ports to > devices") > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyglod at intel.com> > > For a weird reason, this patch triggers a new error: > > examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/pipeline_common_fe.c:In function > ?app_pipeline_track_pktq_out_to_link?: > examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/pipeline_common_fe.c:124:11: > error: ?id? may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe- > uninitialized] > status = ptype->fe_ops->f_track(&pp, > ^ > In file included from > examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/pipeline_common_fe.h:44:0, > from examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/pipeline_common_fe.c:47: > examples/ip_pipeline/app.h:734:26: note: ?id? was declared here > uint32_t n_readers = 0, id, i; > ^ > examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/pipeline_common_fe.c:97:11: > error: ?id? may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe- > uninitialized] > status = ptype->fe_ops->f_track(&pp, > ^ > In file included from > examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/pipeline_common_fe.h:44:0, > from examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline/pipeline_common_fe.c:47: > examples/ip_pipeline/app.h:674:26: note: ?id? was declared here > uint32_t n_readers = 0, id, i; > ^
Hi Thomas, Do You have this error on the same environment?
