Hi Yuanhan,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 11:28 AM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtqueue
> memzones
> 
> ping...
> 
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:33:08PM -0700, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:48:46AM +0000, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> > > @@ -447,6 +453,7 @@ int virtio_dev_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> > >
> > >   hw->vtpci_ops->setup_queue(hw, vq);
> > >
> > > + vq->started = 1;
> >
> > Judging that this is in the "_queue_setup" stage, and we have another
> > stage called "_dev_start", naming it to "started" seems confusing then.
> >
> > So, how about naming it to something like "configured"? Besides that,
> > this patch set looks good to me. If you agree the name change, or have
> > better idea, I could fix it while applying it.

Yes, I agree _configured_ would be better.

Thanks,
Jianfeng 

> >
> >     --yliu

Reply via email to