On Tue, 10 May 2016 11:53:21 +0000
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov at intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Jan,
> 
> 
> >     /*
> > -    * at this point, we know at least one port on this device is bound to
> > VFIO,
> > -    * so we can proceed to try and set this particular port up
> > -    */
> > -
> > -   /* check if the group is viable */
> > -   ret = ioctl(vfio_group_fd, VFIO_GROUP_GET_STATUS,
> > &group_status);
> > -   if (ret) {
> > -           RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "  %s cannot get group status, "
> > -                           "error %i (%s)\n", pci_addr, errno,
> > strerror(errno));
> > -           close(vfio_group_fd);
> > -           clear_current_group();
> > -           return -1;
> > -   } else if (!(group_status.flags & VFIO_GROUP_FLAGS_VIABLE)) {
> > -           RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "  %s VFIO group is not viable!\n",
> > pci_addr);
> > -           close(vfio_group_fd);
> > -           clear_current_group();
> > -           return -1;
> > -   }
> > -  
> 
> I think you've lost this bit when moving things around. I can't find any 
> viability checks in eal_vfio.c

Thanks for this catch, I'll check. I've rebased the patch set once
because there were some changes to the original VFIO code. Hope for no
more such rebasing.

Regards
Jan

> 
> Thanks,
> Anatoly



-- 
  Jan Viktorin                E-mail: Viktorin at RehiveTech.com
  System Architect            Web:    www.RehiveTech.com
  RehiveTech
  Brno, Czech Republic

Reply via email to