Hello Robert/Thomas,
Can you please review the changes in V2 of the Patch and suggest next steps?
Thanks
Regards
Suyash Karmarkar
-----Original Message-----
From: Karmarkar Suyash
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 10:27 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org; thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; rsanford at akamai.com;
reshma.pattan at intel.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2]:rte_timer:timer lag issue correction
Hello,
Can you please review the changes and suggest next steps? Thanks
Regards
Suyash Karmarkar
-----Original Message-----
From: Karmarkar Suyash
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 4:54 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org; thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; rsanford at akamai.com;
reshma.pattan at intel.com
Cc: Karmarkar Suyash <skarmarkar at sonusnet.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2]:rte_timer:timer lag issue correction
For Periodic timers ,if the lag gets introduced, the current code added
additional delay when the next peridoc timer was initialized by not taking into
account the delay added, with this fix the code would start the next occurrence
of timer keeping in account the lag added.Corrected the behavior.
Fixes: 9b15ba89 ("timer: use a skip list")
Karmarkar Suyash (1):
Signed-off-by: Karmarkar Suyash <skarmarkar at sonusnet.com>
lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c b/lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c index
43da836..18782fa 100644
--- a/lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c
+++ b/lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c
@@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ void rte_timer_manage(void)
status.owner = (int16_t)lcore_id;
rte_wmb();
tim->status.u32 = status.u32;
- __rte_timer_reset(tim, cur_time + tim->period,
+ __rte_timer_reset(tim, tim->expire + tim->period,
tim->period, lcore_id, tim->f, tim->arg, 1);
rte_spinlock_unlock(&priv_timer[lcore_id].list_lock);
}
--
2.9.3.windows.1
